|
|
|
Radwanski's Ramblings... Blind faith Not to stoke the leadership fires, which I’m pretty sure don’t exist right now anyway, but did anyone else notice that Harper’s MPs – including a certain jilted potato farmer – gave far more lucid takes on Gurmant Grewal yesterday than he did? The clear message from the MPs, even if they didn’t quite say it, was that Grewal was obviously up to no good, but that didn’t mean they were going to ignore what his exploits had told them about the Liberals. Sensible, and pretty well the same take most outsiders have. Harper’s line? That Grewal is clean as a whistle, and everything he says is gospel. Or, in his words: "The fact of the matter is there was an attempt to buy Gurmant. Gurmant was not bought and Gurmant had no intention of being bought."
Now, Harper knows Grewal, and by all accounts doesn’t much like him or trust him. So he should know that publicly placing all his faith in the guy is probably going to get him burned. Last Britrock post for at least 24-48 hours Funny thing with the new Oasis album. Mainstream publications – Spin, Rolling Stone, newspapers, etc. - are all over it. Meanwhile, the Pitchfork crowd can’t find enough negative adjectives in the poseur thesaurus. Not sure exactly what this tells us, other than that some of these reviews were half-written before the album was ever heard, but Metacritic will give you an idea of what I’m talking about. As for my own review, it’s here. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiWednesday June 1, 2005 Hypothetical question time Suppose that, knowing (or at least guessing) what was on those tapes, the Liberals hadn’t bothered denying it when Grewal first went public. Suppose that, instead, they’d said something to this effect: “Sure we talked to him. Why wouldn’t we have? We’re trying to keep the government from falling, and he seemed interested in helping. We never made him any specific promises in return for voting for us, but of course we let him know that down the road we’d remember it. That’s how politics works. But obviously we weren’t willing to go as far as he wanted us to, because otherwise he’d be sitting on our side of the House, not releasing tapes. I’m not saying it would’ve been case closed. And it wouldn’t have changed the fact that they behaved badly. But assuming the transcript we’ve been given is legit, wasn’t their reaction to the whole thing – i.e. falsely claiming to have rejected Grewal’s advances – a lot creepier than the negotiations themselves? >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiAnd no, I was not among the shriekers Quick Take #1 on last night’s Killers show: They’ve improved. A lot. Based on last year’s Mod Club gig, I thought they’d bomb at the Ampitheatre. So much for that theory. Quick Take #2: I haven’t been to a show with that much shrieking (from the crowd, not the band) in a long, long time. Maybe ever. Probably for the better, that. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiTuesday, May 31, 2005 Hey, the Post called me "our critic" (who knew?) The Oasis review will have to wait another day. But Coldplay is here. Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiMonday May 30, 2005 Yuck Enough with Karla Homolka. Honestly, if you were the victims’ families, would you be more concerned about this wretched woman being glorified by that cheesy b-movie with the girl from That 70s Show, or by all the front-page stories, three-page spreads, childhood photos, and everything else being done to sell her repugnant brand of celebrity to mainstream audiences? Maybe the provincial government should start calling for boycotts of the Sun. Or alternatively, we could all just stop giving her the attention she’s probably enjoying. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiMore than anybody asked to know about my Sunday night A few notes from last night’s Kaiser Chiefs gig at the Mod Club… I didn’t pay much attention to OK Go’s first album, partly because the single didn’t grab be. But from what I saw of their opening set, I might have to give it a listen. Impressively for a not entirely mod-ish band, they certainly won the crowd over…even before the gimmicky (if endearing) dance routine to end off their set. The gap between the good Kaiser Chiefs songs at the start of Employment and the middling ones that fill out its second half isn’t quite as noticeable live, mostly because Ricky Wilson works his ass off to sell all of them. Wilson and the Futureheads’ Barry Hyde could very well be the same person, except the latter plays guitar and the former hops around more. Speaking of the Futureheads, the general similarities are unmistakable…except the Kaiser Chiefs are less punky, better at writing singles, and lack quite the same chemistry between band members, partly because they don’t share vocals. Guitarist Andrew White has the demeanour of a bassist, which isn’t cool no matter how much he looks like George Harrison. Perhaps he could learn from the bassist, Simon Rix, who has the demeanour of a guitarist. Since we’re running through band members, I’d feel mean skipping over Nick Hodgson, since he’s apparently the rare drummer who takes a leading role in songwriting. Oh, and Peanut (the keyboardist) has a lot of potential for a cult following. For crying out loud, the guy’s name is Peanut. British bands have rediscovered lights. Neither Kasabian nor these guys would be for those prone to migraines. Sunday May 29, 2005 Once again, Murphy brings Liberals and Conservatives together Friday’s column (following up on last Monday’s posting) got more positive feedback than I’d expected. Apparently, a lot of political staffers past and present are tired of the new wave of backroom guys actively seeking the spotlight. That, or they’re just tired of Tim Murphy. Either way, here it is. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiHey, Britpop fans... This is your lucky week. Already onsite, we’ve got Friday’s Kaiser Chiefs piece, including an interview with frontman Ricky Wilson. In tomorrow’s Post, you’ll find a lengthy write-up on Coldplay, now that I’m allowed to talk about that once-mysterious interview of a couple weeks back. And on Tuesday (I think), there’ll be a review of the new Oasis disc. Naturally, I’m sure you’re more excited about reading what I have to say about these bands that actually listening to them or seeing them. Like I said, your lucky week. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiFriday May 27, 2005 Voice of reason Julian Fantino’s shrill fear-mongering about a city supposedly spiraling out of control was a pet peeve of mine, as evidenced here and here, among other places. So in the interest of credit where it’s due, I have to say yesterday’s editorial board meeting with Fantino’s replacement as police chief, Bill Blair, was immensely encouraging. More on this in tomorrow’s Post, but the short version is that Blair seems more interested in being a police chief than a politician. And not only does he acknowledge a “conscious” effort to present a more accurate picture of crime; he recognizes that needlessly scaring people is actually what makes neighbourhoods more dangerous. The biggest knock I’d have on him is that he seems a little boring. But after Fantino, that actually seems pretty refreshing. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiMy version of baseball history Before Jon Garland stops tearing up the American League, I feel compelled to point out that he was front-and-centre in one of my all-time favourite ballpark experiences. It was a few seasons ago – Garland was pitching out of the Sox’ pen, and we were sitting right behind it at the Dome. Seated next to us was a guy who looked and sounded almost exactly like Jason Mewes, but evidently boasted a better-than-expected familiarity with showbiz past – because from the moment he saw the name on the back of Garland’s jersey, he devoted almost all his attention to taunting him with “Judy” yells. Or, more accurately, “Juuuuuuuudy! Juuuuuuuuuuuuudy!” For several innings, Garland did his best to ignore him. But finally, he could take no more. After the Juuuuuuuuuudy that broke the camel’s back, he wheeled around, stared at Jay (perhaps looking for Silent Bob), and fired back: “How would you like it if I called you Sally?” Ever since, I’ve been wondering if this happens in every stadium…and if anyone has explained it yet to our man Jon. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiWednesday May 25, 2005 (Belated) housekeeping With apologies for procrastination, last Friday’s column is now on-site. Yes, I think Harper’s pretty well played as Conservative leader. And no, that’s not because I’m secretly in love with the Liberals, contrary to the usual paranoid rantings from the usual suspects. Read the first two paragraphs, folks. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiMonday May 23, 2005 They just can't help themselves... Two very telling articles in the Star over the weekend. The first, published on Saturday, was an excellent piece by Susan Delacourt on the Liberals’ triumphalism after last week’s near-death experience. Delacourt has often been criticized for her closeness to the Martinites, but in this case it served her well. Not only did she witness the grotesque spectacle of Tim Murphy dancing to Material Girl atop a speaker with Belinda Stronach (other journalists were apparently there as well), but she knew the players well enough to know exactly what it meant – that the Liberals had yet again failed to learn any lessons about humility. The second, published the following day, was Graham Fraser’s piece on Tim Murphy. The article itself was weirdly effusive – I have some serious doubts that Murphy is the guy who really saved the government, I’m thoroughly unconvinced he’s driven by his “earnest idealism,” and I don’t think the Grewal incident can be written off on the basis that “nobody who has been surreptitiously taped emerges from the experience looking good.” But what’s more telling is that Murphy was willing to go on the record to talk about himself. This is not what chiefs of staff are generally supposed to do, mostly because there’s no advantage to the leader in having his (or her) staffers getting press. That’s why, for all his flaws, Jean Pelletier was rarely seen in public, and why, in Ontario, Don Guy is this mysterious force who runs McGuinty’s office with 99.9% of the province having no idea who he is. Even Tom Flanagan seems to know that it’s Harper who’s the star, not him. But in the grand tradition of other senior Martinites – David Herle, come on down – Murphy seems to crave a certain celebrity attached to his position. Maybe he wants to run for federal office, maybe he just wants credit for his work, or maybe it’s subconscious. Who knows. But it’s a selfish thing to do. And it proves Delacourt’s point – these guys still haven’t learned a thing about humility. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiSunday May 22, 2005 As a nation waits with bated breath... Okay, this never works. The “we’re not going to release our policies because our opponents will steal them” line is not entirely unusual, but it’s strictly for losers. All it does is make you seem like you’re whiny, paranoid, and eager to make excuses. Will governments steal opposition policies? Sure, if they’re really good ones. But nobody expects the Conservatives to come out with a breathtakingly original idea that others have never thought of. All we’re really looking for them to do is tell us what their government would do differently from the Liberals, other than being less corrupt. I don’t know if Van Loan is really speaking on behalf of his party, but for its sake I hope not. If the Conservatives really don’t plan to start laying out their policies until the writ has been dropped, they’re in even worse shape than everyone thinks. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiSpeaking of bad ideas... This is a reliably stupid one from Mothers Against Drunk Driving. It’s always risky to say something bad about MADD, because everyone likes mothers and everyone is against drunk driving. But it helps to bear in mind that many of their most prominent members don’t appear to be mothers (the fact that they’re men is a dead giveaway), and aren't so much against drunk driving as against drinking. Anyway, there are many reasons why raising the legal age to 21 would backfire. But here’s the one that should interest MADD the most: It would get more drunks behind the wheel. Hey, it’s not like we’d have fewer 19- and 20-year-olds drinking…we’d just be pushing them underground. So no more nights at bars easily accessible by public transit, where cabs are lined up out front, the RIDE may or may not be around the corner, and you’re cut off if you’ve had too much to drink; instead, it’d be over to some basement or backyard in a comparatively remote neighbourhood where there are no buses are in sight, it takes half an hour to get a cab, and nobody watches how much you’re consuming. Sounds like a recipe to stop drunk driving to me. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiAnd speaking of being under the influence... I think you’d have had to do mounds of white stuff to enjoy Friday’s Kasabian show as much as spastic singer Tom Meighan. But even for those of us disinclined to go that route, it was about as good a time as you can have at the Kool Haus. I’d heard very good things about the Lee’s gig a couple months back, but I was still pretty blown away by the professionalism of a band touring its first album. Much fuller sound than on disc, lots of charisma (in a testosterone-heavy sorta way), a good dynamic between the two frontmen, and a really well-paced set list that built to their best song (L.S.F.) to end the main set and their single (Club Foot) to end the encore. And as promised, the lights were pretty cool. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiFriday May 20, 2005 Because I have to say something... I admit to mixed feelings on yesterday’s vote. I would’ve liked to see this Parliament put out of its misery, but I suspect an election would’ve resulted in more or less a duplicate. And for purely selfish reasons, I’m just as happy not to have to spoil the nicest time of the year again with terrible campaign events and diligent nightly viewing of every newscast. I do know how I’d feel if I were a Conservative, though: I’d want Stephen Harper’s head. It’s quite a trick to make Paul Martin’s political judgment and personal appeal both look good by comparison, but Harper is one of the few people who manages it. More on this in today’s column, which for complicated reasons is missing from a couple of markets (back to normal next week). Fear not, all you people whose long weekends won’t be complete without it: It’ll be up here soon. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiSee Radwanski's Ramblings from May 19, 2005 Allow me to be the first to call for a moratorium on any and all discussion of the Grewal saga…not because it’s not worthy subject matter, but because it’s impossible to decipher which of these people, if any, are telling the truth. I mean, honestly, do you really trust Gurmant, Tim, Ujjal, or any of the other players in this little soap opera to give you the straight goods? I’m usually more inclined than some to give political types the benefit of the doubt, but…c’mon. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiLessons learned Here’s what I know about Rilo Kiley from seeing them live that I didn’t know from my interview with Jenny Lewis: Radwanski's Ramblings from May 13-19, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 29-May 12, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 22-28, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 8-21, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 1-7, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from March 25-31, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from March 18-24, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from March 11-17, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from February 25-March 10, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from February 11-24, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from January 28-February 10, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from January 14-27, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from December 31, 2004-January 13, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from December 17-30, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from December 3-16, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from November 19-December 2, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from November 5-18, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from October 22-November 4, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004 All rights reserved. |