Bio            Latest Column              CD Reviews              Archives              Links              Contact              Home   





























































































































Your privacy is important to us. Please read our Privacy Policy.



Radwanski's Ramblings...


Thursday November 4, 2004

We'll chalk up the delay to wanting to be really, really sure about Ohio

This is not, I assume, where you’ve been coming for your election coverage. If it is, you must be well and thoroughly pissed by now. So I’ll throw you a bone with a few armchair observations…

  • In Canada, we’re divided along regional lines. But in the U.S., it’s all about the urban/rural split. Virtually all the biggest cities, as far as I can tell, voted Kerry. Most everywhere else voted Bush. Since there aren’t all that many big cities in the heartland, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out what happened here.

  • I heard a rather disturbing sentiment expressed by some Canadian conservatives yesterday. If I understood correctly, the argument was that those of us who’ve insisted we’re not anti-American – just anti-Bush – will be put to the test now that a majority of Americans have voted for Bush. In other words, it may not have been anti-American to heap scorn upon the President when he’d fluked his way into office, but it will be now that he’s won more convincingly.

    That’s complete garbage. And if I have to explain why, you have no idea how democracy is supposed to work.

  • I also loved all the conservatives falling over themselves to praise Kerry for his graciousness in conceding, which in most cases was a veiled (or not so veiled) way of taking another kick at Al Gore.

    A quick refresher, here: Gore won the popular vote. And he lost by so few votes in Florida that a recount would have been warranted even if he didn’t have legitimate reason to think he’d been screwed over. He was no less gracious than Kerry – he just came a lot closer to winning.

  • Since the exit polls completely crapped out, is there a chance we can just do away with these things next time?

    I understand why opinion polls over the course of a campaign are useful – they give the race a bit of a narrative, and they allow voters to make more informed decisions. But what exactly is the point of producing phony election results hours before the real ones come out, based on asking voters how they cast their ballots rather than just counting them? Do many Americans really have such bad cases of ADD that they can’t wait the final few hours to find out who won?

  • On the bright side, for those of us otherwise less than thrilled with how things shook down, a golden age in the entertainment industry will continue another couple of years.

    Yeah, the Alec Baldwins and Ben Afflecks of the world are a tad tiresome. But the truth is, the Bush presidency has seen – among other things - the best rock music in at least a decade, and the emergence of one of the most compelling talk shows in TV history. This is what happens during troubled times, especially when a Republican is in the White House – unrest breeds dissent, which breeds better art. So at least we have that.

    See, it’s not all doom and gloom now, is it? An invaded country in chaos, more than 1,100 U.S. troops killed, a tanking economy and a semi-adversarial relationship with most of the rest of the Western world…but at least America has its music and its Jon Stewart.

  • Oh, and one more thing: John Kerry sucks.

    Tell me honestly: Could you ever once, even for a moment, imagine the guy in the Oval Office? Me neither. And I suspect most Americans felt the same way, which is why he’ll never be there.

  • >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




    Tuesday November 2, 2004

    Just 'cause everyone else is doing it...

    I’m not going to do any elaborate electoral college projections, since I don’t claim to be an expert on these things. But I guess it would be a cop-out not to give my prediction, so I’ll be honest and admit that I’m expecting another four years of Bush.

    Bear in mind, though, that I was completely wrong in predicting our own election results in June. With any luck, I’ll be even more wrong this time.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

    Future stars

    Somewhat on a whim, I caught the Futureheads at Lee’s Palace last night. I wasn’t expecting to enjoy myself too much – I’d just finished playing ball hockey, so I wasn’t all that much in the mood to stand around, and I hadn’t been all that blown away by their debut CD. But damn, these guys can play.

    45 minutes of pure energy. Hard to describe, really – the best I can do is tell you to picture Franz Ferdinand’s slightly scruffier, slightly punkier kid brothers. Less imaginative than the Scotsmen, maybe, and less danceable, but they pack a hearty punch.

    Word is they’re coming back in October. I’ll be there, and if this is your sort of thing then you should be there, too.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




    Friday October 29, 2004

    Wait...this isn't how professional sports teams are supposed to be run

    The downside of having season tickets for a team is that you feel compelled to go to games even when you know they’re going to be stinkers. But knowing the Argos were making no real effort to be competitive, at least I was braced for Thursday night’s 58-20 debacle at the Dome – unlike many of the other 31,208 unfortunate souls, who went expecting a decent football game.

    The beauty of the Argos’ new regime, though, is that they manage to get something positive out of the unlikeliest situations. So less than 24 hours after their biggest crowd in more than a decade watches them play one of their worst games in more than a decade, they announce that anyone with a ticket stub from Thursday gets a free seat to a game next year.

    You know what I love about this? It’s the sort of thing that you’d ordinarily hear fans idly suggesting (“They should give everyone their money back,” etc.) but never expect a team to actually do. Put this next to the way NHL players and owners are collectively giving fans the finger, and you can understand why Argos attendance has suddenly skyrocketed.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

    Editorial board smackdown

    Marni Soupcoff and I have a mini-debate in today’s Post on the merits of needle exchange programs in prisons. Pick up a copy, and decide for yourself who won. Then e-mail us, so we can rub it in each other’s faces.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

    When did the Prime Minister become the schoolyard wimp?

    Memo to Paul Martin: Stand up for yourself.

    Your offer to Danny Williams was fair – generous, even. He made a big show of rejecting it, so he could play to voters at home. Your spokesman, Scott Reid, was right: Newfoundlanders are going to pay the price for their premier’s immaturity. So why are you now trying to make nice with Williams, contradicting your spokesman, and generally acting like the whole blow-up was your fault?

    Every time the premiers bluff, you fold. You’re letting yourself, the most powerful person in the country, be bullied. If your own pride isn’t enough incentive, then stand up for the country you’re weakening every time you cave in.

    To borrow from the immortal Darrel Stinson, it’s time to prove that you, sir, have the fortitude and the gonads to be prime minister.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




    Thursday October 28, 2004

    What's good for East Vancouver is good for Kingtson Pen

    As I’ve written here and elsewhere before, I still haven’t quite made up my mind on how the law should treat hard drugs. But this is an absolute no-brainer.

    Obviously, it would be better if convicts weren’t shooting up in prisons at all. But the reality is that its rampant, and addicts behind bars are even more likely to share needles than those on the outside. So this is about as clear-cut a case of harm reduction as you’re going to find.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

    Cheap laughs

    With apologies for being juvenile, this made me laugh

    And with apologies for being really juvenile, so did this.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




    Wednesday October 27, 2004

    On this one, I wish I was wrong

    My record as a political prognosticator is not exactly spotless. I picked Stockwell Day to reclaim the Canadian Alliance leadership over Stephen Harper in 2002, to be eternal embarrassment, and I predicted the Conservatives would win more seats than the Liberals in this year’s election. So when I occasionally get one right, I have to claim the credit while I can.

    Allow me to direct your attention, then, to the column I wrote for the Citizen in April 2003, shortly before the Quebec election. In light of what Charest and friends have been up to lately, I think it might merit a second look.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




    Monday October 25, 2004

    Mind you, it's hard for me to be objective since I'm part of the vast liberal media conspiracy...

    One of the most tiresome things about U.S. politics, in my opinion, is the endless debate about media bias. There isn’t a single conservative or liberal, it seems, who doesn’t feel hard done by, and who isn’t keen for everyone else to know about it. It’s whiny, it’s boring, and it’s counter-productive – especially because it ensures that the media will become politicized, if it isn’t already.

    So imagine my dismay to find that, on this side of the border, the Conservatives are reportedly making similar noises about our own national media.

    Many will no doubt agree with their griping. Personally, I’m inclined to think gallery types are less interested in pursuing any particular partisan or ideological agenda than in generating and sticking to a good narrative – hence the manner in which Paul Martin was treated much more harshly than Stephen Harper in this year’s election campaign. But even if Conservatives are getting a raw deal, is going to war with the press really going to help?

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

    Cleveland rocks (or at least doesn't completely suck)

    If you’re like me, your first impression of Cleveland was probably shaped by Major League. In other words, you remember that credit sequence panning around the city looking desolate and decrepit, and assume it’s a complete dump.

    Having just spent the weekend there (for the Browns-Eagles tilt, which fortuitously proved to be one of the best NFL games of the year), I can happily report that first impressions can be misleading – especially when they’re formed by watching ‘80s baseball comedies.

    I’m not saying it’s the kind of place you want to spend a week-long vacation. But courtesy of some serious reinvestment in downtown (the new football stadium and the Rock ‘N’ Roll Hall of Fame certainly help), it seems to have come a long way pretty fast. If your travels should take you there, there are worse places to spend a night or two.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




    Saturday October 23, 2004

    If Bush had campaigned against rap-metal, he'd have won every state

    Yesterday, I spoke with Alan Cross (program director at 102.1 The Edge, and a fountain of modern rock knowledge) for a piece I’m hoping to get done soon. We got onto the subject of troubled times leading to better music, and he pointed out that, in particular, controversial Republican presidencies seem to bring out the best in artists.

    This raises a troubling question: If Kerry comes through on Nov. 2, will quality decline to the point where it mirrors the appalling crap put out in the latter years of the Clinton era?

    I’ll happily cross that bridge when we come to it. But it’s good to know there’ll at least be a silver lining if Dubya repeats.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

    Amateur hour

    Now, you know I love the CFL. In fact, I wrote my column about it this week. But I want others to like it, too, which is why I find the way it’s shown on TV much of the time so bloody frustrating.

    The CBC broadcasts, I think, are not bad. But while TSN does a nice job with its studio panel, its in-game coverage is absolutely awful.

    Last night, I only caught the last couple of minutes of the Lions/Stamps game – but I saw enough to know it was a case-in-point.

    As B.C. marched down the field for the game-winning field goal, the broadcast was so poorly directed that it missed the start of most plays, picking them up partway through. Play-by-play man John Wells, who’s amassed a lot of respect in his lengthy TV career but still has no idea how to call a game, actually made the game more confusing to follow, instead of less. And when the game ended on a controversial call, with the Stamps thinking they’d pulled off a last-second onside kick to steal a win and the refs ruling against them, it took a couple of minutes for TSN to come up with a replay – and when it finally surfaced, it wasn’t from a useful angle.

    Memo to TSN: Yes, you deserve full credit for really investing in the game the past few years; without you, the CFL’s resurgence probably wouldn’t have been possible. But the players are doing a good job in delivering a solid product. Now do your part and learn how to broadcast it.

    On a slightly related (but less cranky) note, the nice people over at the CFL asked me to write a piece from the fan's perspective for their newsletter, and I obliged. You can find it, along with some other enjoyable stuff, over here.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



    Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004





    Site best viewed using Internet Explorer

    Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.

    © Design and Content 2004
    All rights reserved.