|
Thursday October 6, 2005
Hot Buttons R Us
Wow! A real debate. This is progress.
For what it’s worth, my vote is legalize and regulate…heavily. Licensing. Age requirements. Regular health checks. Severe crackdowns on anyone – prostitutes, pimps, johns – who break a very tight set of rules.
Not saying it would be ideal. But much, much better that than a system that drives women underground, does little to focus effort on underage prostitutes, disease prevention or a host of other problems, and actively discourages vulnerable women from seeking police assistance when crimes are committed against them.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Tuesday October 4, 2005
Yep, this is what you waited five days for
Back from Montreal, somewhat overloaded on beer and frites. (Seriously…I enjoy the frites as much as the next guy, but they come with everything there. I ordered sauerkraut in a pub…and sure enough, along came the frites.)
My take on Pop Montreal from yesterday’s Post is here. I’m aware that the way I did the festival wouldn’t be for everyone; some would go considerably more obscure than I did. But bear in mind I had to report on the thing for a national newspaper. For many of our readers, even the biggest headliners at an event like this are pretty damn obscure. Besides, I refuse to feel guilty for taking advantage of a lot of great artists being in the same place at the same time.
A few other notes from the weekend that didn’t make it into print:
For all the worthy competition, Metric was unquestionably the best thing I saw. Now getting a sense of how well Live It Out translates live, not to mention how many levels it works on to begin with, they’d be my Canadian band of the year if I were asked to choose right now. And encouraging news for Emily Haines: Girls seem to dig her as much as boys. Maybe more. Which is a good sign, I think, that her attempts to make indie sexy are going the way she wants them to.
Montreal crowds, as we’ve all been told a million times, are indeed vastly superior to Toronto ones. They make noise at the appropriate moments. They sing along. They chant. They don’t spend all their time looking self-conscious. But moshing? What’s up with that?
If you’re from Toronto and you think the Opera House or the Phoenix are in slightly sketchy neighbourhoods, try Club Soda sometime. Within five minutes of Sunday night’s Kings of Leon show, we’d encountered a hooker buying a hot dog for her pimp and two guys lighting a crack pipe on a park bench.
That said, both Club Soda and Cabaret are nicer venues than any comparable spots in Toronto, with the possible exception of the Mod Club if you like things glossy. Properly designed concert halls, but still clubby. And while it’s probably a sign I’m getting old, when watching five or six hours of music each night, having the option of sitting in seats overlooking the floor is rather welcome.
I really like Arts & Crafts. They’re nice people, they’ve signed some great acts, and it looks like one of their recent gambles, Most Serene Republic, is showing some serious signs of development. But this New Buffalo thing really isn’t working out. I saw her at the Drake a couple of weeks ago, and thought maybe I was just tuning out because I was overtired. But the word from those who caught the full A&C showcase in Montreal was that she was a bit of a speed bump, and audience reaction was apparently not kind. Maybe she’s a grower, but I have my doubts.
I love the Deadly Snakes as a live act, and I love their new disc. But the two together are still a bit of a work in progress. Their set on Friday night was good, but not as good as they can be…mostly, I think, because they’re still trying to figure out how to integrate gospelly soul into a punky garage act. I’m sure they’ll figure it out, though.
I don’t know who exactly the Sunday Sinners are, other than four girls and a guy from Montreal in spiffy white suits. But they’re extremely enjoyable. They don’t exactly look like they should be adept at producing credible late ‘60s R&B, but they more than pull it off.
Sam Roberts’ still excels in a club, especially when he’s getting love from an adoring hometown crowd. But the man is very quickly becoming the Tragically Hip. Just saying.
I’m determined to make myself a salesmen for Lovely Feathers. If they’re not huge by this time next year, I’ll have failed. If they are huge, I’ll probably have had nothing to do with it. But don’t think that’ll stop me from taking credit.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Apologies in advance to Nova Scotians who object to their provincial government being a training ground
I’m a little late on the Peter MacKay/Nova Scotia saga. But if I were a federal Conservative, I’d be hoping he went.
No…it’s not because I think he’s more a hindrance than a help to Harper. However duplicitous he may be – and I still can’t get over the David Orchard thing – he’s almost certainly smart enough to know that inheriting the leadership before the next election would be the worst thing that could happen to him.
So why cheer a provincial move? Because someday, it would be nice for the Tories to have someone who’s actually governed, rather than just opposed. It’s not their fault none of their senior members, with the exception of Vic Toews (I stand to be corrected if I’m forgetting about more), have ever been called on to actually make a decision in government – that’s what happens when the same party has been in power forever and its not yours. But if more of them spent a bit of time honing their craft in the minors, they’d be a lot better prepared whenever it is that they do take power. That holds especially true for MacKay, who could usefully prove there’s a little steak with that sizzle.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
A little moralizing never hurt anyone
Spotted on a Montreal video lottery terminal this weekend: a government warning to call a problem gamblers’ hotline “avant les ideés suicidaires.”
I won’t claim that this helped me form an opinion in any way, because I’ve been on an anti-VLT kick for a while. But is any venture that requires that sort of warning really something that the government should be involved in?
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Thursday September 29, 2005
There's a reason for the term "jailbait"
If you’ve been around here a bit, you’ve probably gathered I’m not much of a social conservative. But this baffles me.
At 14, our age of consent is absurdly low. In fact, I’m pretty sure most adults assume it’s 16, or higher. Provided the Conservatives were prepared to include a “close in age” exemption ensuring sexual partners relatively close in age weren’t targeted, which they seem to have been, why on earth would anyone have bothered opposing their proposed reform?
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Shaggy!
I’ve been feeling a little guilty the past few days.
See, a couple of weeks ago, I got an e-mail asking if I wanted to interview Shaggy. I declined because…well, because it was Shaggy, and I do have a day job I’m supposed to be doing at the Post, and…again, it was Shaggy. But somehow, this led to a very nice young woman new to the Post getting asked to do it instead.
So far as I know, this was the young woman in question’s first music interview. And if it wasn’t exactly initiation by fire, it was initiation by an extremely creepy dude who thinks he’s hot.
Nothing about this interview sounds like it was even remotely savoury, not least because Shaggy seems to be a little touchy (that’s “busy hands” touchy, not fly-off-the-handle touchy). But where he really outdid himself was in response to her final question.
This is the part where delicate eyes should turn away, because things get a little blue. Or, if you prefer, just plain gross. Then again, maybe you’re the sort of person who’ll just think it’s boombastic. In which case, please stay as far away from my family, my female friends, and - well, anyone I know, actually – as humanly possible.
Nice young woman: What’s your philosophy in life?
Shaggy: Live it. Live it. I have a philosophy - show your boobs to as much men as
possible, there will be a day nobody wants to see them droopy motherfuckers.
Bang as much as you can., there will be a day when no man wants to bang your
ass. And if I were God, and I blessed you with a beautiful body, perky
titties, and nice ass, and a pretty-ass face, and you decide that you're
going to wear a turtleneck all your damn life - in the next life, I would
bring your ass back as a cow. There you go.
And to think, this man once played the halftime of an Argos game. For shame.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Au revoir
Off to Montreal, which might explain why I’ve got music on the brain so much. For those of you who prefer the politics (you know who you are), I promise to get back to more of that next week.
Meanwhile, for others who are Pop Montrealing or are at least vaguely curious, some recommendations from various performers there of which artists they’re keen to see. It sort of relies on the fault premise that they’re all sticking around all weekend, but if you can get past that, I’m actually kinda proud of this one.
Also, my Metric interview/write-up, which was pretty fun because Emily Haines turned out to be a really good interview. Plus, a review of the Stones’ Toronto show and the usual takes on assorted discs.
Like I said, music on the brain. Promise to be more wonkish next week.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Tuesday September 27, 2005
When life gets in the way
Apologies for the uneven postings the past few days. It’ll probably be that way till early next week – crazy busy till Thursday, and then I’m off to Pop Montreal for a few days. Hopefully, I’ll at least come back with some good stories.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Communications 101
John Reynolds is a smart guy. So what on earth was he thinking putting his name to this?
Surely, he knows that if you want to downplay rumours, the last thing you do is repeat them. A couple of days ago, I really didn’t think Harper's leadership was “in question”; the fact that his supporters have now launched a campaign explicitly laying that out almost makes me wonder if I was wrong.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Toronto gets Rocked
Not to be flippant, because thisdoes point to a lot of areas we all know we need to improve at anyway. But seriously…how much business is Toronto really at risk of losing to St. John’s? >> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Definitely more common ground with Richards than Jagger, though
I don’t make too many claims to uniqueness, but I’m fairly sure my review of last night’s rock spectacle/Vegas show (in the Toronto edition of today’s Post, and on here shortly) is one of very few Stones reviews you’ll find that draws comparisons to Ryan Adams.
It makes more sense when you read it. But to be truthful, I probably had Adams on the brain. However much he may irritate – and he irritated plenty of folks at his Kool Haus gig earlier this year – the countryish stuff he’s been cranking out lately is irresistible, even if you don’t think you like country. I liked Cold Roses a lot, but if you’re in the right mood (or the wrong one, considering how somber it is), the new Jacksonville City Nights is hard to top. We’re not quite in Heartbreaker territory, but we’re getting there.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Sunday September 25, 2005
Housekeeping, special "assclowns" edition
I know it’s just from a campus paper, but this is still one of the strangest concert reviews I’ve ever read – mostly courtesy of the bizarre twist it takes toward the end, reflected in the headline.
If you’re looking for much more, er, worthy music writing, my interview from Friday’s paper with Black Rebel Motorcycle Club is now here.
If you think that’s boring, I’m not sure what you’ll make of Friday’s column dissecting Paul Martin’s speech to civil servants, which is now here. But again, think worthy.
And since we’re jumping around between politics and music, all in the name of getting you to read my Post stuff, my take on the Dandy Warhols’ latest is now over in the reviews. It’s pretty brief, but if you still don’t have the attention span, all you really need to know is that you should avoid the appropriately wankishly titled Odditorium or Warlords on Mars like the plague.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 9-22, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 2-8, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from August 19-September 1, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from August 5-18, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 22-August 4, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 15-21, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 8-14, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 1-7, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 24-30, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 16-23, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 10-16, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 3-9, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 20-June 2, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 13-19, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 29-May 12, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 22-28, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 8-21, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 1-7, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from March 25-31, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from March 18-24, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from March 11-17, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from February 25-March 10, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from February 11-24, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from January 28-February 10, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from January 14-27, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from December 31, 2004-January 13, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from December 17-30, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from December 3-16, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from November 19-December 2, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from November 5-18, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from October 22-November 4, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004
Site best viewed using Internet Explorer
Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.
© Design and Content 2004
All rights reserved.
|