Bio            Latest Column              CD Reviews              Archives              Links              Contact              Home   





























































































































Your privacy is important to us. Please read our Privacy Policy.



Radwanski's Ramblings...


Thursday October 7, 2004

Throwing away the script

Ordinarily, I think most onlookers would probably take Jack Layton for the most volatile of the federal party leaders. But looking back on the past couple of days, isn’t he looking like the only one who hasn’t completely lost his marbles?

Or maybe, by Ottawa standards, he’s gone nuts. After all, he might actually sacrifice a bit of partisanship in the name of getting a few policies his party supports. That’s not how it’s supposed to work, is it?

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




Tuesday October 5, 2004

Unsolicited secondhand advice

A few years ago (or maybe just a couple…the memory blurs), a very smart Liberal friend of mine suggested that progressives in his party would do better to jump aboard the Martin Cauchon bandwagon than waste their time with the likes of Allan Rock, Brian Tobin or whoever else challenged Paul Martin.

As it happened, the bandwagon took a little longer than expected to emerge – mostly because the former justice minister didn’t bother with a futile campaign of his own back then. And even now, Cauchon-mania isn’t exactly sweeping the nation. But I’m starting to think he was on to something.

John Manley is no less conservative – or uncertain of what he stands for - than Martin. Maurizio Bevilacqua lacks the gravitas, at least for now. Rock had his chance, and there’s no way he’s coming back from the Big Apple. Tobin rubs too many people – present company included – the wrong way. Everyone else is too young, too old, too unproven, too proven to be unworthy, too worn out, too far from the mainstream…

Meanwhile, Martin Cauchon – one of the few Chretien-era ministers to come out looking pretty darned good - is busy getting headlines for bold, progressive speeches at Harvard. And if you care about such things (which you shouldn’t, but some people do), he’s of the right linguistic background for that stupid rotation thing his party has going.

If I were a Liberal, I might just be heeding my friend’s advice about now.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Attention, aspiring Bay-area music writers: Your local tabloid may soon have an opening

Okay, I know I promised no more Libertines posts for a while. But this is too good to pass up, and anyway, it’s not really about them.

Looking forward to their Toronto date next week, I thought it’d be fun to look up a couple of reviews from their other North American dates. And so I happened upon this write-up from San Francisco. It begins promisingly enough, with an assessment that “Britain's rock scene is stronger than it's been in years; and at the very front of the country's high-profile pack are The Libertines.” But then things go badly off the rails.

See, I don’t claim to be an expert reviewer; since it’s not really my main gig, I always feel like I’m one slip-up away from being found out. But I’d like to think that, at the very least, I wouldn’t go to one of these shows and praise Pete Doherty for having “finally gotten his act together, enough, at least, to lead his band through a hard-charging set of cuts…” Nor would I write about him “opening the band’s set with The Delaney,” or about how he and Carl Barat “spared the crowd the usual between-song ramblings, opting to let the music speak for them.”

Why not? Because if nothing else, I pride myself on knowing who’s on the bloody stage. And unless our intrepid reviewer was hanging around a London crackhouse, I can safely assure him that Pete Doherty – not currently a member of the band he was reviewing – was nowhere in site.

On the bright side, at least he enjoyed the show. Too bad he had no idea who he was seeing.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




Monday October 4, 2004

Cheers!

In his assessment of last week's presidential debate, Warren Kinsella touches on something I've been meaning to write about for a while - namely, that you should always bet on the candidate you can better imagine having a beer with.

Hopefully, I'll have a chance to columnize on this soon. But just in case I don't, just remember that you'd have to go back to 1976 to find a presidential election in which the guy harder to imagine hanging out with has wound up occupying the Oval Office. And I'd hold that the same trend often - though not always - holds true on this side of the border as well.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Pot, meet kettle

At least, that's what I'd say about this if I were the snobby, Alberta-bashing Ontarian everyone thinks I am. Yes, there's a difference between bashing the premier and bashing the province, but I'm starting to sound like a broken record. So instead, I'll just suggest you enjoy the accompanying Ed Broadbent "campaign photo."

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Exponentially Inflated Ticket Price + Terrible Venue = Very Bad Mood

Saw Franz Ferdinand for the second time in a few months on Friday night. They were more than solid, as previously. But man, does the Docks ever suck as a venue. Between the overcrowding and the terrible sightlines, it would have to be a hell of an act to get me back in there again.

Oh, and a word to the wise: If you promise your girlfriend/significant other concert tickets for her birthday, make sure you actually have tickets in hand when you make said promise. Do not – repeat, do not – wait too long to buy them through Ticketmaster, then be forced to scurry out of work early on day of concert to buy from scruffy dude outside venue. Not good times.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




Friday October 1, 2004

Housekeeping

Much focus on the left today.

For those with slightly drier tastes, there’s yesterday’s column on the state of the NDP. And for those who like their politics a little livelier, there’s Monday’s Green Day interview/review. Rage on, all you Jesuses of suburbia.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Feelin' (double) blue

Well, this really sucks. Any chance I was ever going to give cash to my alma mater (assuming I ever have the cash to give, of course) just went out the window.

Memo to the Argos: Go to the Ex. Go there now. And don’t look back.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Further proof that low expectations are a politician's best friend

All right, so maybe John Kerry’s not quite as much of a disaster as I thought. For the record, I still think Bush is going to win. And I’m still clinging to the view, expressed long before me by Milan, that the Dems would’ve been better off with Dean. But at least there were signs of life last night.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




Tuesday September 28, 2004

Paging George Smitherman: Your bureaucrats are out of control

I was in Montreal this past Saturday for a friend’s bachelor party, so I didn’t get much chance to read the papers. But now that this has been brought to my attention, I feel obliged to comment even if it’s a bit late.

I’m not, for the most part, one of those people who spends all my time bemoaning the “nanny state.” But occasionally, our zest for rules and regulations gets the best of us. And I’d say banning sushi the way it’s prepared pretty well everywhere else in the world would qualify.

This all goes back, I suspect, to that uproar that was caused a couple of years ago by the Star’s exposé on lax health standards in Toronto restaurants. While the paper got a bit hysterical in its coverage, some of the stuff it uncovered – rat-infested kitchens, for instance – was genuinely disturbing. So the ensuing crackdown was warranted, insofar as it brought basic standards up to date and put more inspectors in restaurants.

Now, though, we’ve turned into food safety zealots. With no regard for traditional preparations that have served certain cultures perfectly well for centuries (or longer), rules are being rigidly enforced even if there’s no good reason for them.

Seen a whole lot of stories about Ontarians being poisoned by bad sushi lately? No? Me neither. But I won’t be surprised to see bad sushi – not spoiled, just less tasty – turning customers off Japanese restaurants and costing jobs. I hope it’s worth it to correct a problem that didn’t exist in the first place.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Honesty is the best policy

Hey, the Ontario Tories are out of denial about the deficit they left us with. Or at least, they're no longer claiming that the books were set to be balanced when they were punted from office - a helpful sign that they're no longer delusional.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




Saturday September 25, 2004

Jesus of America has converted me

I know I said previously that I was on the fence about American Idiot. But I was already starting to come around a few days ago, and last night's gig at the Phoenix sealed the deal.

Pretty astounding stuff...and I'm not just saying that because I was flattered that Tre Cool thought I needed a "punk nickname" during my interview with the band the day before. (It's "Adam Bomb," if you must know, and I'll be insisting it's used as my byline on all op-eds from now on.)

In any case, look for the interview and more in Monday's Post, plus the interview transcript somewhere around here eventually.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Your weekend reading (if you have too much time on your hands and can't afford a newspaper subscription)

The semi-infamous Ralph Klein column is now onsite, as is my more recent and somewhat less controversial take on John Tory's leadership victory. I'm tempted to point out that, like King Ralph himself, the first offering may be a little bit past its best before date. But I don't want to flood my inbox again.

Did I say that out loud? Oh crap...

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004





Site best viewed using Internet Explorer

Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.

© Design and Content 2004
All rights reserved.