|
|
|
Radwanski's Ramblings... Episode #368 of Stephen Harper vs. the World Most Canadians probably don’t care about this, but I find Stephen Harper’s constant whining about the media more than a bit annoying. Occasionally, he has a point. Usually, he doesn’t. Like this time, for instance. The polling numbers are bad, so naturally it’s the media’s fault – because, you know, “polls will always reflect the views of the papers that sponsor them." Yeah, that’s the ticket. After all, the Sun has always been out to get the Conservatives – which would explain this poll it commissioned last month showing the Tories 14% behind the Liberals nationally, and Harper not just miles behind Paul Martin, but also slightly behind Jack Layton as “Best PM.” (Apologies for the odd link, but it was the easiest way to get this to you for free without crashing your computer with a PDF file.) Can't they just stick to the lesbian Christmas cards? I really, really don’t want to have to stick up for the Bloc, but this is a really, really bad idea. Occasionally, youth wings come up with cutting-edge stuff; mostly, they just throw out dumbass ideas that sound edgy, like telling Quebecers that the party they elected in the vast majority of their ridings isn’t really a party. Fighting injustice wherever I find it It’s possible I wasn’t in the right mood, battling a fever at the typically sweaty Horseshoe, but Clap Your Hands Say Yeah really didn’t blow me away this past Saturday. The Fembots, on the other hand, did, and I couldn't help but find a certain unjustice in their being relegated to an opening act for this particular band. A fuller review from yesterday’s Post elaborates on that, and is now here . Only three days late... If my scattered postings over the past week have been a bit all over the map, hopefully Saturday's column offers a more focused take on the New Orleans disaster. Followup This, via Neale News, goes some way toward explaining FEMA’s atrocious performance in general and its chief’s perplexing comments in particular. Much as it’s still early to be assigning blame, I was wondering even before I read this story how this guy could possibly keep his job after what’s happened the past week. Apropos the White Providers vs. Black Looters subplot, meanwhile, a reader directs us to this. Oh, and move over, Jeffrey Loria, Art Modell et al. I think we have a new candidate for the most loathsome owner in sports. Levity I know that picking on Sun columns is shooting fish in a barrel, but if you have a dark sense of humour, you’ll probably get a kick out of this. As far as inane takes on Katrina’s aftermath, this one has it all. In just 700 words, our man Bob manages to: Proclaim that the networks blew the whole thing out of proportion. The notion that New Orleans was out of control? "Hogwash." Finally let us in on the full picture by breathlessly revealing what the media has “sloppily” reported: that the flooding was caused by “dams called levies” not being able to stand up to “darling Katrina.” Surmise that most of the victims were of a certain pigmentation because, unlike whites, blacks “chose to ride it out – to do nothing.” Paint Bush as the city’s white knight for “[leaving] his summer White House in Texas and [returning] to Washington to take over personal command of a nasty situation.” Randomly lump Canada in with various rogues and communists (“even countries like Canada, Cuba, China and Venezuela are now offering help”). Issue a passing call for Paul Martin to take unspecified action against “our greedy, opportunistic oil companies.” Smack down the “naysayers” by noting that “morale is already starting to pick up” in New Orleans. End off with what has to be the week’s loopiest prognosis: “Soon, these naturally joyous people will be dusting off their longtime unofficial motto: ‘Laissez les temps roulez’ – ‘Let the good times roll.’” Nothing I can say could possibly top that last bit, so I’ll just shut up now. "I've had no reports of unrest" Just saying I’m not sold on the “George Bush doesn't care about black people” part of Kanye’s rant. (Not that I'm entirely unsold on it, either, but you'll have to read my column in today's Post for a better idea of what I'm on about.) But the White Providers vs. Black Looters complaint was probably the most frequent one I heard from friends watching the coverage this week, Thursday in particular. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiAnonymous no longer I’d be remiss not to mention that, in response to my request earlier this week, a bunch of Our Lady Peace fans stepped forward to identify themselves. I hesitate to point them in the direction of my review of Healthy in Paranoid Times, which joins a few other new ones over here. But as detailed therein, it’s not as though critics’ snipes (or quasi-critics’ snipes, in my case) is going to turn them off anyway. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiFriday September 2, 2005 Like looking at a train wreck, only much, much worse In case you’re looking for it, my column will be in tomorrow’s Post, instead of today’s. In the meanwhile, I can’t seem to avert my eyes from CNN. I’m not usually much for round-the-clock crisis coverage, but this is just such a jaw-dropping spectacle – caused largely by jaw-dropping human error and incompetence – that it leaves me at a loss for words. I’ll try to overcome that for the aforementioned column. Incidentally, when I do switch away from CNN, it’s mostly to check in on how Fox News is covering it. I’ve never really watched much of Fox, and was pleasantly surprised by the way they were dealing with what’s going on… that is, until they started vaguely lumping all the folks wandering and floating around the New Orleans streets in with the looters, and suggesting that many of them had neglected to evacuate for the sole purpose of being able to loot after the fact. I’m sure that applies to a very small contingent, but the notion that most of those going through hell these past few days have done so for selfish reasons is pretty deplorable. I suppose it’ll be a good line for the likes of Fox when this thing eventually turns into a massive debate about race and class, though, which I think is pretty inevitable once matters have finally stabilized and we’ve had a chance to digest the images we’ve seen. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiAnd now for something far more trivial... Is there a more blatant cash-grab in Ontario than DriveClean? I was all for it back when it started, and when a test revealed needed upgrades on my old car a few years ago, I happily complied. But the thing is, it’s completely pointless now that all cars made in the past few years are engineered in a sufficiently ecologically responsible way that they’re guaranteed to pass. From what I can tell – and this was more or less confirmed by a chatty service centre employee when I took our car in for its test yesterday – there are only two reasons this program hasn’t been phased out. One, the government likes getting its cut. And two – probably the bigger of the two - businesses that shelled out $100,000 to install the testing equipment are furious at the prospect of having it shut down before they can even recoup their expenses, and have told the government as much. Like anyone else who’s spent the summer in Toronto, I’m all for cleaner air. But at this point, DriveClean has nothing to do with that. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiRadwanski's Ramblings from August 19-September 1, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from August 5-18, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 22-August 4, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 15-21, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 8-14, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 1-7, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 24-30, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 16-23, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 10-16, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 3-9, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 20-June 2, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 13-19, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 29-May 12, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 22-28, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 8-21, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 1-7, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from March 25-31, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from March 18-24, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from March 11-17, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from February 25-March 10, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from February 11-24, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from January 28-February 10, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from January 14-27, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from December 31, 2004-January 13, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from December 17-30, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from December 3-16, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from November 19-December 2, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from November 5-18, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from October 22-November 4, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004 All rights reserved. |