|
Thursday February 10, 2005
It's official: I'm a glutton for punishment
Instead of my column this week, you’ll find me debating Lorne Gunter on the merits of Chrétien’s golf ball routine. Sort of. Our pieces go in somewhat different directions, but it boils down to Lorne thinking he proved exactly why he’s small-town, if not cheap, and me arguing that he proved exactly why he was a more successful politician than Paul Martin.
Pick up a Post and have a look. And if you like, feel free to send notes of support. They’ll be a nice counterbalance to the pile of bitchy e-mails guaranteed to be in my inbox by the time I get to work.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Watch out...it's the Keane Army
I’m continually amazed by the insatiable appetite of Toronto concertgoers for…well, anything.
I was all set to write up a little item on this coming Sunday’s Keane/Zutons show at the Kool Haus for the arts section’s Toronto calendar. Actually, I did write it up, only to find that there was no point in running it because tickets are no longer available.
I know it’s a big city and all. But there are actually 2,500 people, or thereabouts, who pounced on tickets for an insipid Coldplay knockoff and a decent – but still not exactly dazzling – Britrock band that nobody I know (other than, uh, me) has actually listened to? (I hear the Redwalls, who are opening the evening, offer some value added…but they haven’t even released an album yet, so it can’t be them.)
Anyway, I’d better work quicker to give heads-up. And on that note, I’m circling Feb. 26-28, which’ll give us Kasabian the first night, the Futureheads the second, and Ian Brown the third.
Also looking forward to giving the Comas a try at Lee’s next Wednesday. No cover, for some reason, so no excuses.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Tuesday February 8, 2005
Hopefully, this'll all be cleared up in time for them to see The Da Vinci Code
After seeing this, I couldn’t be happier that I went to a movie at the Paramount last night.
I have a hard time imagining enough of the Ned Flanders crowd will stay home to actually put a dent in Famous Players’ business. So basically, all this means is a few hardcore types are going to have to see their Disney movies at comparatively crappy Cineplex Odeon theatres, while the rest of us endure the horror of a brief pro-gay marriage spot before the previews start.
Oh, wait…these are the same types who boycotted and protested Disney for being too liberal, aren’t they? Er, does Mel Gibson have anything coming out soon?
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Monday February 7, 2005
Conspicuous consumption (conspicuous around my waistline, at least)
I’m feeling pretty disgusting today. Which is becoming an annual tradition, really, that falls on the first Monday of February.
See, I’ve gotten into the habit of hosting a little Super Bowl get-together each year. Which means a bunch of friends come over, we huddle around the TV, and by the end of the evening we’ve each gained somewhere between three and five pounds.
(Note: I’m quite serious about the weight gain. One of the prop bets I got suckered into last night was whether the combined extra poundage of three of our guests would exceed seven pounds. We had a weigh-in and everything. It wasn’t even close: I had the under, and we barely even needed the third guy to step on the scale to know I’d lost.)
This year’s consumption, if memory serves, included mini Philly cheesesteaks; crab dip; salsa, onion dip, and all manner of other stuff that goes on chips; shrimp; jalapeno poppers; wings; chili; perogies; and strawberries dipped in chocolate. That last item, along with several of the other fancier offerings, was part of Jen’s successful effort to add a touch of class.
Throw some beer into the mix, and you can understand why I’m not operating at full capacity. But then, I probably feel better than certain guys wearing green jerseys last night. Just by setting the alarm properly, I think I proved my superior skills in clock management.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Stephen Harper: pacifist
So let me see if I’ve got this straight. Less than two years ago, Stephen Harper is so keen on the Iraq war that he goes on Fox News to tell Americans how embarrassed he is that we’re not right there with them. Now, there’s actually some talk of sending Canadian troops to help out…and he’s saying the Liberals will “pay a severe political price” if it happens.
Harper offers two reasons for his sudden lack of enthusiasm: He’s pissed that the Liberals branded him pro-war during last year’s campaign and now might be flirting with it themselves, and he’s concerned about stretching our military too thin.
The first complaint is just pathetic. Party policy shouldn’t be based on settling scores from past elections. And besides, for all the dirty campaign tricks the Liberals have pulled out, highlighting the differences between his position on Iraq (he would have sent troops) and theirs (they chose not to) is not one of them.
As for concerns about our lack of military capacity…hey, nobody’s arguing. But it wasn’t much better 22 months ago, when Harper still thought we were good to go. And the manner in which he made the point – following a tour of the disastrous HMCS Chicoutimi – was completely disingenuous, since we wouldn’t exactly be taking on Iraqi insurgents by sea.
Personally, I wouldn’t send Canadian troops anywhere near Iraq. But I’m not a Conservative…not that I’m really sure what that means at this point, anyway.
For all the flak Paul Martin has taken for his lack of any sense of direction or purpose, Harper deserves just as much. If anyone has any idea what he stands for, other than trying to pander to enough constituencies to win government, I’d be curious to hear it.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Friday February 4, 2005
If you can't take the heat, etc.
It’ll be posted here over the weekend, but the gist of yesterday’s Post column was that Paul Martin deserves some credit for once – because given the potential for same-sex marriage to hurt him rather than help him at the polls, it’s a rare case where he seems to be guided by principle rather than politics.
Predictably, a bunch of readers responded that Martin can’t really be considered principled, given his unwillingness to allow a complete free vote on gay marriage. Which, frankly, is becoming a really tiresome argument.
It’s partly the PM’s fault, mind you, for previously raising expectations that he would let ministers “vote their conscience” on this sort of thing. But to accuse him of being undemocratic for expecting Cabinet to vote as one is absurd.
See, that’s kinda how our parliamentary democracy works. Ministers don’t cherrypick which policies they want to support; once they go out into public, they support the government’s agenda. Period. And if they can’t do that, then they get out of Cabinet.
If you think the government is all over the map now, just try it with every minister spouting off in a different direction and patching together his or her own agenda.
If John Efford or anyone else in Cabinet really believes they can’t in good conscience support this legislation, they should have it in them to resign. If they don’t, then they can’t really feel all that strongly about it in the first place.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Good things come to those who wait...and wait...and wait...
You know, it’s great news that Rogers will be spending more on the Jays in the next three seasons. But wouldn’t it have made a hell of a lot more sense to announce this a couple of months ago, so the team could actually compete for a few free agents this year?
I’m not saying it’s not good news either way. But when your fan support has dwindled as much as it has, patience isn’t really a luxury you can afford.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Thursday February 3, 2005
Gotcha!
Could someone explain to me how, when I was scanning the news last night, this story was easier to find than this one?
When outsourcing lapel pins gets more play than spending billions of dollars to revitalize cities, it’s safe to say we’ve officially lost all perspective.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
And you will know me by the trail of discarded opinions
A few years ago, I was handed a copy of Madonna, …And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Dead’s second studio album. I listened to a few tracks, decided this brand of noise rock wasn’t for me, and went on my merry way.
Fast forward to a couple of weeks ago, when I decided it might be time to stop ignoring all the good press and give them another try. And lo and behold, not only am I now all over their latest, Worlds Apart (which I’ve plugged in today’s Post), but also the disc that preceded it, 2002’s Source Tags and Codes.
It’s now my mission to dig through my shelves and find Madonna. Because I need to know which of us changed – them or me. Probably the latter…in which case I have a lot of catching up to do, don’t I?
Update: Dyslexia for cure found.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Tuesday February 1, 2005
All bow before the interim editorials editor
Yesterday morning, the Post calls for Ernie Eves to give up his seat for John Tory. By evening, he’s gone.
Our power knows no bounds.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Ahem
So a couple of weeks ago, I go out on a limb and say Razorlight might just be the rare Brit band that’s professional enough to win over North America.
Since then, Johnny Borrell has walked off-stage mid-set in Denver, been forced to flee this continent early and owing to laryngitis, and has now put off the band’s UK tour, purportedly for the same reason.
Just in case you thought I was always right, or something. Still giving the disc a lot of play to and from the office, though.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Saturday January 29, 2005
'Nuff respect (or not, as the case may be)
I don’t usually spend a lot of time agonizing over Sun columns, because…well, I’ll let you fill in the blanks (you never know who could be at the desk next to you one day). But Michael Coren has more of a following than most, which is why I found it hard to let today’s column pass without mention.
See, if you read Coren, or listen to him, or watch him, he goes on ad nauseum about how tired he is of people with his opinions – that would be social conservatives – being treated disrespectfully. He might actually have a point, albeit a heavily exaggerated one, but it would be a lot easier to stomach if he wasn’t more venomous than the social liberals he objects to.
A sample from today’s aforementioned column, in case you opt out of reading the whole thing: “And the same people who brought down Stockwell Day would dearly love to bring down Stephen Harper. Red Tories, fiscal conservatives, the empty and hollow people who appear to care more about taxes than they do about morals.”
So conservatives who don’t agree with him on abortion or gay rights are worthless and immoral. Nice. But at least he kept that attack general, unlike the one on Belinda Stronach for having the temerity not to toe the party line on same-sex marriage: “Belinda has views on things? Who knew! I can't recall a single statement or speech she has made since becoming an MP, and most of what she said when running for office had all the substance of cotton candy.”
That last point, admittedly, is fairly uncontestable. But I’d be curious to know how often Coren has sat glued to his TV in mid-afternoon watching members’ statements and questions and committing to memory every utterance by a rookie MP.
I’m also curious how he’s determined that she’s abandoned her “principles” by supporting gay marriage, considering I never heard her express that she didn’t. But I wouldn’t want to show my intolerance for so-cons by taking this any further.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
And so ends the lamest smackdown since the Tony Danza/Dr. Phil feud...
Congratulations to all concerned. Now please, let’s never, ever speak of this again.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Politics as usual
I’m usually happy to beat up on the B.C. Liberals a bit. And siding with Rafe Mair isn’t something I’m going to make a habit of. But he’s absolutely right – this week’s Prem Vinning saga was a total non-event.
Hey, I’m not advocating calling radio stations under fake names to help out your politician of choice with softball questions. But if you’ve worked in or around politics, you know that every party does it. And the flip-side is that if they don’t, their opponents will just load up the lines with hardball questions instead.
Dodgy? Sure. But I feel a bit bad for Vinning, since he just happens to be the one out of a hundred who got busted.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
It doesn't take much to get me excited
The last time I paid for a digital TV station, it was Book TV – and truthfully that was because it was the only station showing Homicide, possibly the best drama ever (seriously). But this month’s free preview might have convinced me I need to get these music channels.
It was pleasant enough, late last night, to find an extended airing of The Wedge - really the only MuchMusic show I can watch. But the piece de resistance was to be found on the retro channel, where – I kid you not – I got to see Organized Rhyme for the first time since the early ’90s. It’s almost enough to make me appreciate Tom Green…and almost certainly enough to make me fork over a couple of extra bucks each month.
On a slightly more serious music note, though not quite as serious as he might like (could anything be?), my Conor Oberst review from yesterday’s Post is here.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Radwanski's Ramblings from January 14-27, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from December 31, 2004-January 13, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from December 17-30, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from December 3-16, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from November 19-December 2, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from November 5-18, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from October 22-November 4, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004
Site best viewed using Internet Explorer
Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.
© Design and Content 2004
All rights reserved.
|