|
|
|
Radwanski's Ramblings... Housekeeping My two Liberal convention columns – the one heading into Ottawa and the one heading out are both now available for your enjoyment. Unless you’re a Liberal, in which case you’ll probably only enjoy them if you have a self-hating streak. Also, my Kings of Leon write-up is up as well. This one should offend fewer of you; I’m pretty sure the only people I insulted were critics who compare them to the Strokes. And I’m going to go out on a limb and assume this is not the first place most critics come to for their music info. On message, for once I don’t always agree with the Post’s editorials. (And yes, I know that’s weird since I’m currently serving as editorials editor…let’s worry about it some other time). But you won’t find me dissenting from today’s defending Monte Solberg. It’s not hard to find genuinely regressive types in the Conservative caucus. But Solberg is not one of them. And the uproar over his blog is one of the most disingenuous hit jobs I’ve seen in a while. For the record, I don’t think Solberg’s Martin Luther King posting was all that funny – but that’s because it was clumsy, not because it was racist. Any idiot could see he was mocking the Prime Minister, not the civil rights hero. And while I disagree with his suggestion that same-sex marriage isn’t a human rights issue, I’m under no illusion that he was trying to equate gays with cattle, or whatever the Liberals are claiming. The sad part of this is that it’s going to discourage other politicians from actually trying to speak (or write) in their own voices, instead of just recycling talking points and press releases. Solberg’s blog, as Warren Kinsella has noted previously, is a rarity for its forthrightness and personal touch. I hope he doesn’t get dissuaded from keeping it up just because his opponents have played so dirty with it. How Swede it...(No! Stop! Must not pretend to be the Sun after a Sundin game-winner!) I was pretty sure my favourite Swedish album of 2005 would come courtesy of the Soundtrack of Our Lives. But Mando Diao's Hurricane Bar totally kicks its ass. I'm not exactly sure who these guys are, but I plan to figure out in time for next month's gig at the Horseshoe. And hey, we haven't even heard the Raveonettes' new disc yet... You know you're at a Liberal convention when... Foreshadowing like a champ Back from Ottawa. I’d share more of my thoughts, but I already did that in today’s Post column, and I can’t just give it away, now, can I? (Okay, I probably can…but you’ll have to wait a few days. So drop three quarters in a box, you cheap bastard.) One thing, though: This looming Ottawa-Queen’s Park feud is not some PR trick to distract from an ugly provincial budget. It’s the real deal. And if they’re not careful, it’s going to claim casualties on both sides. I’ll elaborate more soon, hopefully in column form. But you heard it here first. Or if not first, early. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiEither you'll think I'm a genius, or you won't remember this Having now heard their studio sound, in addition to seeing them live, I’m fairly confident the Redwalls are about to be buzzed about. Not wildly original, but if you like your retro Britpop extra Beatlish and don’t mind it coming from Chicago, you’re gonna be all over them. Their album’s not out yet, but it’s on their site. It sounds better played live (and they have a fun schtick), but it’s still a pretty solid first effort. Oh, and make sure to download Build a Bridge while you're at their site. It's not on the album, apparently, but it's better than anything that is. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiFriday March 4, 2005 Stay the course I have to admit, I’ve been wavering a bit lately on George Smitherman’s merits as provincial health minister. Amid all the press about ‘Furious George’ and what-not, I was starting to think maybe someone less confrontational would be a better fit. After yesterday’s editorial board meeting with Smitherman, I can safely say…screw that. Of all the ministers (federal and provincial) we’ve had in since I started at the Post nearly three years ago, he was by far the sharpest, most focused and most well-prepared. And whether you agree with all the specifics, it’s impressive to see a health minister with a more comprehensive plan than just to plug the leaks in the system and hope to escape unscathed. The more I think about it, the more I’m convinced McGuinty will be making a big mistake if he caves in to critics’ pressure at some point and slides someone more adept at group hugs into the Health portfolio. Smitherman has been gutsy enough to initiate comprehensive reforms (including, but not limited to, shifting toward regional management and family health teams), and he’s probably the only guy with a reasonable chance of seeing them through. To back away now would leave the system caught betwixt and between, and probably in worse shape than the Liberals found it in. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiToday's lesson: How to attach a 'kick me' sign to your back in 700 words or less My Post column today probably wasn’t the smartest thing I’ve ever written. Bashing the Liberals and their convention even as I prepare to spend two days hanging around them? What was I thinking? Don’t mind me…I’ll be the guy trying to figure out why he left Toronto during Canadian Music Week to hit Ottawa during Liberal Schmoozefest 2005. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiKing me As evidenced by Wednesday’s show at the Opera House, Kings of Leon thoroughly rock. My piece on them in today’s Post does not rock nearly as hard. But if you’re a fan (of them, not me), hopefully you’ll find enough nuggets in there to make it worth a read. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiWednesday March 2, 2005 The ultimate in lameness: convention snobbery I haven’t been to a proper convention in a little while, so forgive me if I’m a bit rusty on hospitality suite etiquette at this weekend’s Liberal schmoozefest. But if you’re gonna be there and want to catch up, drop me a note. That goes double if you’re not – repeat, not – the sort of person who’s going to spend an hour of my life talking my ear off about the policy resolution your riding association is putting forward, or how badly your friend got screwed over trying to run for a Young Liberal position. Kidding. No, wait…I’m not kidding. I’m not kidding at all. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiMama's boys My favourite part of yesterday’s interview (to be worked into a piece in Friday’s Post) with the alarmingly baby-faced Kings of Leon? The revelation that the reason expletives are blanked out of the lyrics on the liner notes is that their mama (or at least the mama of all but guitarist Matthew, who’s a cousin) cries when they use cuss words. If I were a girl, I’m pretty sure I’d find that adorable. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiTuesday March 1, 2005 Would it make a difference if he looked more "Canadian"? I’m not sure how, in less than two years, we’ve collectively managed to forget just how shallow Peter MacKay proved himself by signing an agreement he never intended to honour in order to advance his political career. But helpfully, he’s served up a reminder. This time, he’s not beating his opponents by misleading third parties; he’s trying to score political points by adopting a completely reckless approach to Canadian citizenship. It’s possible that the grounds on which he’s arguing for Fateh Kamel’s potential removal – i.e. that Kamel may have obtained his citizenship under false pretenses – has some merit. But the underlying message that we should deport him because he’s a terrorist it pretty scary. Whether they’ve been here five years or five generations, our citizens are our citizens. If they break the law, however heinously, we stick them in jail. What we don’t do is try to pawn them off on somebody else, or ship them back wherever we’ve determined they originally came from. If we do, citizenship won’t mean a hell of a lot, will it? >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiIan Brown, resurrected So yesterday afternoon, I’m having a conversation about how, somewhat to my horror, Oasis is basically just a nostalgia act at this point. A few hours later, against my better judgment, I’m watching Ian Brown – the guy who Liam Gallagher borrowed his stage demeanor from – playing at the Mod Club. Now that’s a nostalgia act. And, for that matter, a train wreck. This was one of the most schizophrenic shows I’ve ever seen. Brown comes out. Starts playing a new song. Stops halway through because he doesn’t like the sound. Gets over it. Plays a couple of new songs. Sounds like crap. Proceeds to three straight Stone Roses songs, which sound terrific. Crowd is lapping it up – arms in the air, sing-alongs, the whole bit. It’s all starting to be a pleasant surprise, until our man completely loses it over the sound – which is fine as far as us common folk can tell, but is apparently driving him mad. So we go through at least 20 minutes - probably more – of screwing around. He stops and starts. He leaves the stage. He threatens to wrap things up. Finally, a pair of roadies do what they can, and we’re back on track – if going through the motions while gesturing incessantly about the sound qualifies as on track. Just as things are warming up again, Brown decides his differences with the sound are irreconcilable and says his good nights, encouraging ticket-holders to try to get some of their money back. Ticket-holders are pissed. But unexpectedly, he responds to the few lingering cheers, re-emerges, and storms his way through an encore set (including I Wanna Be Adored). Leaves. Returns to play another couple of songs – new ones, but surprisingly agreeable – and leaves for good with a modicum of faith restored. I can’t say I’m entirely sorry I went; at least it wasn’t boring. But if you came in wondering why the Stone Roses never made it big on this side of the Atlantic, I’m pretty sure Ian would have cleared that up for you. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiMonday February 28, 2005 In tomorrow's Sun: How McGuinty's tax hike turned him into Jeffrey Dahmer From my limited experience with him, I like Lorrie Goldstein as a person. I’ve also generally found him to be one of the more thoughtful and independent-minded of the Sun columnists. But I can’t figure out if yesterday's column comparing the federal Liberals to wife-beaters and child abusers offended me more as a person (for the repugnant way it trivialized one of society’s worst ills) or as a writer (for the contrived way it stretched a lame comparison for 700-odd words). Either way, it’s bloody awful. >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski Good, but not second mortgage good Lacking Kasabian tickets Saturday, we figured there had to be a pair available for a decent price outside the door at Lee’s. We were wrong. There are very few things I’ll pay a 700% markup for, and an entertaining but thoroughly unoriginal posse of lad-rockers is not among them. That said, I’m curious if it lived up to the hype. So if you were there, let me know. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiFriday February 25, 2005 Your column companion You can’t always get every point you want to make into a 750-word column. So it strikes me that if you’re reading mine in the Post today, you might come away with the impression that I think ballistic missile defence is a great idea. Since I’d hate for that to happen, allow me to clarify: I actually think it’s a pretty stupid idea. But it’s stupid for the U.S., not for us, and only because it’s such an absurd use of tens of billions of dollars that could be better spent elsewhere. So as stupid as I think it is for the Americans to move forward with it, I think it was even stupider for us not to join them. Let’s review. Signing on would cost us nothing. It would have no tangible impact on the way the program is implemented, since it’ll happen with or without us. But it would be the cheapest, most efficient means at our disposal to improve relations with the U.S. So is there any reason – any at all – why we’ve opted out? And if there is, wouldn’t it be a simple courtesy for the PM to share it with us? >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski Unqualified endorsement One of my favourite blogs the past couple of months has been Tart Cider - it’s funny and sharp and, most unusually for something found in the blogosphere, unpredictable. Anyway, today’s posting is a gem. If I were running a seminar on blogging (which, uh, I did…but let’s not talk about that), I’d hold it up as Exhibit A of how you do it. Snappy headline, tight writing, a fusion of politics and pop culture, and a completely ruthless take-down of a totally deserving target. It just works on so many levels. >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiMy weekly recommendation of a derivative British band I quite like the Kaiser Chiefs’ debut disc – or at least, I quite like the first half of it, which means they’re in Killers territory beyond even the musical similarities. But track down a copy, have a listen, and tell me if this isn’t the most inevitable album to come out in months. I mean, could you listen to Franz Ferdinand, the Futureheads, the aforementioned Brandon Flowers Four et al and not expect an upstart British band to follow up with songs that sound exactly like this? >> Send your comments to Adam RadwanskiRadwanski's Ramblings from February 11-24, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from January 28-February 10, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from January 14-27, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from December 31, 2004-January 13, 2005 Radwanski's Ramblings from December 17-30, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from December 3-16, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from November 19-December 2, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from November 5-18, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from October 22-November 4, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004 Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004 All rights reserved. |