Bio            Latest Column              Music              Archives              Links              Contact              Home   





























































































































Your privacy is important to us. Please read our Privacy Policy.



Radwanski's Ramblings...


Thursday July 14, 2005

Oh, they went, all right...

As you may have gathered from my profile in yesterday’s Post (to be posted on-site soon), I wasn’t quite sure what to make of the Go! Team. I’d heard good things about their live act, particularly at SXSW, but it was hard to grasp how their sample-heavy disc - basically done by one guy - would translate into a stellar show by sextet.

Anyway, on the evidence what went on at the sauna masquerading as Lee’s Palace last night, I now get it. I’d still be hard-pressed to describe them – they don’t so much genre-hop as transcend genre altogether, with a phenomenal hip-hop frontwoman dancing up a storm, something approximating an indie band behind her, and all sorts of instruments in places you wouldn’t expect them. But whatever they are, they’re awesome.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Wednesday July 13, 2005

Loaded question

If this whole ugly saga were going on in Canada, rather than the U.S., how many e-mails would I have gotten proclaiming us a corrupt third-world cesspool?

Our friends who spend half their time wishing they lived south of the border would do well to remember that one of Americans’ more endearing – if occasionally dangerous - qualities is that they don’t waste much time on self-flagellation.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

This is not progress

Much as I don’t support two-tier care, I understand the arguments for it – mostly that it would ease the strain on the public system by allowing those who could afford to go outside it to do so, and that the ensuing competition would force the public system to improve itself.

As far as I can tell, though, the half-assed proposal being put forward by Ralph Klein’s Tories would achieve none of this. Allowing patients to pay for better service within the public system would give Albertans the worst of all worlds – a model in which the rich would receive better service than the poor, but without in any way easing the strain on the system. This wouldn’t end the “medicare monopoly,” as my colleagues like to call it; it’d just allow that monopoly to play favourites.

Here’s hoping this never gets off the ground – or if it does, that it never catches on beyond the limited scope Klein’s likely to introduce it within.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Tuesday July 12, 2005

Every dark cloud has a silver lining

My colleague Lorne Gunter, far more attuned to global affairs than almost anyone else I know, draws our attention to a rather disturbing Sunday Times piece suggesting it may no longer just be extremist Muslims carrying out extremist Muslim crimes.

If so, advocates of racial profiling just lost their best argument. Looks like harassing that kindly old (white) grandma at the airport might not be such a bad idea after all.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Oops

This is almost too easy, and I feel bad about it considering there are far more important things to say about Chuck Cadman (see today’s editorial in the Post), but I can’t resist: Think Ezra would like to have this one back?

And no, it’s not just that it looks bad now that Cadman’s no longer with us. An unfounded allegation that a guy virtually on his death bed had sold his soul for a non-existent patronage appointment looked pretty bad at the time, too.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Knowledge of self, yes; knowledge of what I'm going to write, not a chance

Chatted with k-os yesterday for the Post - my first hip-hop interview, though obviously with someone who has bucketloads of crossover appeal.

Anyway, fascinating guy. But it’s not going to be real pleasant trying to condense the conversation into a short feature. When a guy throws out about 500 thoughts per minute, it’s pretty challenging to do him justice in 800 words.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Monday July 11, 2005

Feel the love

Got back from a friend/colleague’s wedding up in Muskoka yesterday (congratulations to Marni and Richard, by the way) to find a rather full inbox. Admittedly, this wasn’t a surprise. Sometimes, I’m caught off guard by the response I get to a column; with Friday’s, it was pretty well a given.

Naturally, most of the correspondents furious with my suggestion that conservatives convey a dislike for Canada proceeded to outline the reasons they dislike Canada. Or maybe some of them weren’t really furious with me, and were sincerely letting me know I was right (using their angriest, most paranoid voices). It can be hard to tell.

Representative of the somewhat more lucid (but no less hostile) responses is this blogger’s take.

I’ve never actually met this person, so far as I know, which may explain why she’s greatly overestimated my clout. (“Guys like Radwanski are part of Ottawa’s connected crowd … part of that network of people who know all the people, who are the people who decide what matters. He speaks for them.” Good on me, considering how little time I spend in Ottawa.) But more importantly, she seems to have joined most of the others frothing at the mouth over this column in somewhat missing my point.

I’m not suggesting conservatives actually hate Canada – not most of them, anyway, and certainly not Monte Solberg. My point is that the bitter, frustrated way they go about their communications conveys that impression, and that it hurts them in the court of public opinion. I’m not sure why this is so hard to grasp.

I’m also not entirely clear on why I keep being accused of unfairly casting an isolated quote from one MP as indicative of a common message from conservatives (of both the big- and small-c variety). For those who started writing their screeds before they got to this part of the column, here’s that handy description of Canada’s evolution courtesy of Stephen Harper, back in his pre-leadership days: “a second-tier socialistic country, boasting ever more loudly about its economy and social services to mask its second-rate status.”

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Damned if we do...

Does anybody else find it strange that many of the same people who’ve been (rightly) lauding Londoners’ nonchalant, tough-minded response to last week’s attacks have simultaneously been griping that Canadians – not just the government, but common folk as well – aren’t sufficiently panicked about the imminent threats against our own country?

In other words, it’s cool for Brits to go to the pub after their city’s been bombed…but Canadians are fools for refusing to live in a constant state of panic over attacks that have yet to happen. Makes sense.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

While we're being inquisitive...

At the risk of providing more evidence of my Torontocentric worldview, could someone explain to me why TSN is skipping the Argos/Lions game this coming Friday in favour of Winnipeg/Edmonton?

This isn’t a large-market/small-market thing – it’s a question of quality. The Bombers (0-3) are so horrible that their game with the Eskimos will probably be over by halftime. Meanwhile, we’ll be missing out on a Grey Cup rematch between teams that haven’t lost since their thrilling Week 1 game. What am I missing?

And yes, I apolgize for making you read through today's other two posts to get to the most imporant one.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Friday July 8, 2005

The day after

Nothing overly profound to offer on yesterday’s horrors in London. Just two quick takes:

  • First, in terms of the impact this’ll have on public opinion in the UK, my guess is not much beyond a hardening of views. Those supportive of the war on terror and their country’s involvement in Iraq (not the same thing, in my opinion) will be all the more so. Same goes for most of those opposed.

    I know the effect of 9/11 on New Yorkers was profound, with heretofore liberals rethinking their views. But aside from the much smaller scale the London attacks were on, the difference is that this didn’t come out of the blue; terrorism, its causes and how to prevent it have been top-of-news for four straight years, so opinions have already been cemented.

  • Second, if there’s one positive to be taken out of this – and I know that’s a stretch, considering we may still be looking at a rising casualty count – it’s that this sort of thing is still surprising.

    Remember back in 9/11’s immediate aftermath, when we thought we’d entered an age in which terrorist attacks would be commonplace? It hasn’t happened, really. Yes, Madrid, Bali and London have all been horrific. But gratuitous orange alerts and the like notwithstanding, we’re not all living in a constant state of fear, which is presumably what al-Qaeda was initially aiming for.

  • Why that is could be debated endlessly. Improved security stopping al-Qaeda before they start? Military efforts putting a dent in their ranks? Bin Laden's bunch never actually being as well-organized as they were given credit for?

    Probably some combination of the above. But whatever it is, Western society is still by and large a safe and calm place. Not that that'll make Londoners feel much better today.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

    In case you're wondering (and you know you are...)

    My column will run in the Saturday Post this week, rather than today's. It's on Canadian politics, and for obvious reasons that doesn't take priority today.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski


    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 1-7, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 24-30, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 16-23, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 10-16, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 3-9, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 20-June 2, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 13-19, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 29-May 12, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 22-28, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 8-21, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 1-7, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 25-31, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 18-24, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 11-17, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from February 25-March 10, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from February 11-24, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from January 28-February 10, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from January 14-27, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from December 31, 2004-January 13, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from December 17-30, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from December 3-16, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from November 19-December 2, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from November 5-18, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from October 22-November 4, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004





    Site best viewed using Internet Explorer

    Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.

    © Design and Content 2004
    All rights reserved.