Bio            Latest Column              Music              Archives              Links              Contact              Home   





























































































































Your privacy is important to us. Please read our Privacy Policy.



Radwanski's Ramblings...



Wednesday November 16, 2005

(Partial) Housekeeping

There’s a bunch of politics and music stuff from the Post I’ve been meaning to get up here, but I’ve been a little scattered this week. So here’s last Friday’s column for starters, with more to follow soon.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Oh, crap...now I'm the one who seems Leafs obsessed

After not seeing a live NHL game for over a year-and-a-half, I wound up at two within a 72-hour span – at the Bell Centre Saturday, and at the ACC last night.

Admittedly, it’s not quite fair to compare the two. For one thing, Leafs/Habs is always going to have a special atmosphere; for another, Saturday’s game was a wild, high-scoring one, whereas last night’s was a bit of a snoozer. But still, I’m pretty convinced by this point that catching the Leafs on the road in Montreal, Ottawa, Buffalo or wherever else is much more worth the effort than tracking down tickets here.

The ACC itself is a great facility – much better than the Bell Centre, in terms of sightlines and intimacy and what-not. But both the crowd and the in-game production are just so…sterile. I know it’s better on Saturdays and during the playoffs, but still – a hockey crowd should at least be a little livelier than the gray-haired contingent that comes out for Jays games.

In any event, I’m now more appreciative than ever of the amount of fun that I have at Argos games. Speaking of which, four days and counting. I’m jacked.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Tuesday November 15, 2005

Also, the nightlife there sucks

You’ve probably already read more than you could possibly want to on the prospect of an election. So let’s just leave it at this: One of the dangers of having the capital in a city that wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t a government town, like Ottawa or D.C., is that it’s far too easy for politicians to get caught up in what’s going on there and lose sight of how normal, everyday people view things.

This breathless push toward a campaign, which has somehow become almost an end in itself rather than the means to something bigger and better, is a prime example of that.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Too much sympathy can be dangerous

Tart Cider, who’s been a wee bit Leafs obsessed lately, puts his myth-slaying skills to somewhat more ambitious use to by debunking some thoroughly questionable Canada-bashing numbers.

Those so inclined will see the skewing of sexual assault stats as an indictment of the UN. Others will take aim at victims’ rights groups. Me, I fall more into the latter camp.

It’s highly unappealing to criticize victims’ rights groups, in no small part because they tend to be led by well-intentioned people whose close family have suffered horrific crimes against them. (Joe Wamback, whose organization Tart Cider takes aim at, is of course the father of Jonathan Wamback, the teenager who suffered serious brain damage after nearly being beaten to death.) But actually allowing those groups to set public policy – as certain parties, or at least certain members of certain parties, are inclined to do – would completely distort the justice system.

Appealing as vengeance against rapists, murderers and other violent criminals may be, it can’t be the driving force behind the system. For the record, I’m all for tougher sentences than the ones that currently tend to be handed out. But justice has to be cool-headed, not reactionary. And related policies can’t be determined, much as it may be noble to try to do so, by catering to the tiny percentage of the population whose vision of how society usually functions has been clouded by their own tragic experiences.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Monday November 14, 2005

Quebec drivers: perhaps not such an unfair stereotype after all

Back from a brief foray to Montreal, and feeling a little out of sorts. Admittedly, I’m always slightly discombobulated for a day or so whenever I get back from anywhere. But owing to a particularly topsy-turvy day yesterday, this one’s worse than usual.

I’ll spare you the details, at least for now. But let’s just say I’m never, ever entrusting my car to a hotel parking attendant again.

Thankfully, there were consolations. The Leafs’ improbable win. The guy behind me authentically yelling “Tabernac” when the Habs missed scoring chances. The proud return of Youppi!. Smoked meat. And so on.

Enough to have me looking forward to returning later in the week to pick up the damaged car? Er, no. Plus, I had to miss the Als/Riders playoff game, although it seems like a lot of fairweather Montrealers did likewise. But I’m still mostly glad I went.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Bas fishing

So this is what happens when you mess with Balkissoon. John Tory, you've been served!

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Cracking good

I really didn’t want to like the new Babyshambles album. As big a fan as I was of the Libertines, Pete Doherty’s antics got tiresome a long time ago, and I’ve started to feel like an enabler every time I support his musical endeavours.

That being said, Down in Albion is a reminder that it wasn’t just baseless NME hype that put Doherty in the spotlight in the first place. Yes, it suffers from its excesses: There are at least four tracks that never should have come anywhere near an album, which’ll happen when your disc is more than an hour long. But although he’d be even better if he’d go a little lighter on the self-pity, Doherty is still one of the best lyricists out there. He has an ear for a ragged tune and has apparently surrounded himself with some reasonablydecent (if equally debauched) musicians. And Mick Jones (speaking of enablers), clearly one of the only people capable of getting Pete at least moderately focused, does a remarkable job of pulling it all together more often than not.

If you don’t believe you can be touched by someone as utterly ridiculous as Doherty, download Albion (the song, not the album), and see for yourself.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski


Wednesday November 9, 2005

Covering my bases

I’m back on municipal politics – law and order, in particular – in today’s Post, or at least the Toronto edition thereof. But if it’s the national stuff you’re more interested in, which is understandable if you don’t live in the Centre of the Universe (and possibly even if you do), this past Saturday’s column is now here.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Even without Joe Theismann, it's still a bad idea

The three-man booth is possibly the worst invention in the history of sports broadcasting. If you’ve watched Sunday Night Football, you know what I’m talking about. So why are we now being subjected to this on local Leafs broadcasts?

The annoyingness is somewhat limited by the presence of the second colour guy at ice level, rather than in the booth, and by the lack (so far) of annoying banter between the three of them. On the other hand, it’s ramped up by the choice of the thoroughly obnoxious Glenn Healey as the new addition.

Anyway, I’m praying they get rid of it before it escalates. I don’t want to start turning the volume off on my hockey games, now, too.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Tuesday November 8, 2005

Rant of the day

This is getting ridiculous.

According to Jack Layton, “if there is a motion of non-confidence on the table at the House, we will not be supporting or indicating confidence in the government.” But the NDP is waiting to see who else brings forward a motion.

According to Stephen Harper, “if Mr. Layton is really serious about opposing this government, he can take the initiative.” But the Tories’ November 15 motion is “not a confidence motion,” and "we're not going to bring forward our own confidence motion before Christmas.”

According to Gilles Duceppe, "Mr. Layton has to make a move. It's up to him." The Bloc, like the other parties, will vote against the Liberals – but they won’t bring the motion against them forward.

You want to know why people think politicians are all a bunch of weak-kneed, two-faced opportunists? Because of crap like this. You guys want an election? Then one of you have the fortitude and gonads, as Darrel Stinson would say, to trigger one. Otherwise, please leave us alone.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Band of the day

If not the nicest outright, The Duke Spirit were the most pleasant, unpretentious, human band I’ve interviewed in quite a while. We sat for an hour yesterday in a hotel bar chatting about this, that and the other, and I would’ve happily done more (as I suspect they would’ve) if not for the label rep starting to look a bit antsy.

Not sure when the interview will run, though it should be soon. But in the meanwhile, go and track down some of their music. I hesitate to say Velvet Underground and Nico, because that’s what everyone compares them to, but it’s a good enough starting point if you pretend Nico had fronted every song. These guys (or at least, guys and girl) will either break soon or have a cult following that’ll be relieved they never did. Either way, get in now.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Saturday November 5, 2005

Jack slack backtrack

It only took me a few hours to regret yesterday’s Layton post – that being the time between writing it and watching his press conference.

There are limits to how much self-indulgence anyone can stomach, and now that Layton is reaching Bernard Lordian levels, I think I’ve had my fill.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Betcha $5-million I would've been nicer to her

You know, if I’d known what Ashlee Simpson was up to mere hours before our interview, I probably would’ve cut her more slack.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Friday November 4, 2005

Oh, Curtis Jackson, you rascal!

These guys can’t be serious. Then again, it’s Bob Runciman, so I guess they are:

GRITS AND CITY PERFORMING DOUBLE SPEAK ON GUN CRIME?

Leeds-Grenville MPP Bob Runciman, the Ontario PC's critic for the Attorney General, today called on the McGuinty government and the City of Toronto to explain why they allowed a movie that glorifies youth gun crime to be filmed in Toronto and quite possibly, supported by Ontario taxpayers.

The movie, "Get Rich or Die Tryin'" scheduled for public release next week, stars former drug dealer Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson. Demonstrations against the movie have already occurred in Los Angeles.

"I think it's important to know why the city on one hand would issue a permit for the filming of this kind of movie and on the other suggest they're doing everything they can to discourage violent gun crime in the city," said Runciman, a former Solicitor General.

"It's also important to know if the provincial Liberals issued tax credits for this production" he continued. "If they did, it raises serious doubts about the sincerity of their commitment to combat gun crime."

"We can't forget that 50 Cent is the same guy that former Chief Julian Fantino tried to keep out of Toronto because of his history of promoting violence" Runciman stated.

See www.50cent.com

-30-

It’s all good, but I think my favourite part is the stuff about how the film was “quite possibly” supported by taxpayers, and “if so” it’s really, really bad. Dude…every heard of FOI? Do your homework, then we’ll talk. Maybe we can even bring Wherry along to sell you on 50’s Republican credentials.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Cutting Jack slack

I know that I’m in the minority of Canadians not vaguely (or more than vaguely) irritated by the mere sight of Jack Layton. But I’m still not quite getting all the hate being piled on for his efforts to “blackmail” the Liberals.

A significant contingent of Canadians vote for the NDP, but the party is never, ever going to win power. So if you’re the leader, and for the first time since the 1970s you have a chance to actually set some public policy, why on earth would you pass it up to go to an election in which you have no chance of earning a better opportunity?

It’s not as though Layton is trying to line his own pockets. Agree with them or not, he’d focused on policies that he and other New Democrats were elected to advance. Which is more, frankly, than can be said for any of the other parties.

(Unrelated note: If you’re looking for my usual Friday column in today’s Post - and who isn’t? – it’ll actually be running tomorrow instead.)

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

The requisite Boisclair joke...

He would've been at the dinner himself, but he had the sniffles.

If you think that was weak, please e-mail me your own. So long as they offend self-righteous coke-snorting separatists, they're good with me.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

What you really came here for

When I asked for Ashlee Simpson questions, I got more responses than expected. So much as I did not, sadly, follow the suggestion to solicit her opinion on whether “the narrow victory by Angela Merkel prevent her from making some of the needed structural changes to the German economy,” perhaps there’ll be some interest in reading what I did come up with for yesterday’s Post.

I’m not saying it’s going to win me any NNAs. But I promise that, at the very least, it’s not your typical celeb puff piece.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski


Radwanski's Ramblings from October 28-November 3, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from October 21-27, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from October 7-20, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from September 23-October 6, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from September 9-22, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from September 2-8, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from August 19-September 1, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from August 5-18, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 22-August 4, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 15-21, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 8-14, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 1-7, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 24-30, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 16-23, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 10-16, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 3-9, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 20-June 2, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 13-19, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 29-May 12, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 22-28, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 8-21, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 1-7, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from March 25-31, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from March 18-24, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from March 11-17, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from February 25-March 10, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from February 11-24, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from January 28-February 10, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from January 14-27, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from December 31, 2004-January 13, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from December 17-30, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from December 3-16, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from November 19-December 2, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from November 5-18, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from October 22-November 4, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004





Site best viewed using Internet Explorer

Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.

© Design and Content 2004
All rights reserved.