Bio            Latest Column              Music              Archives              Links              Contact              Home   





























































































































Your privacy is important to us. Please read our Privacy Policy.



Radwanski's Ramblings...


Wednesday April 20, 2005

"Did I mention I'm mad as hell?"

Okay, let me get this straight.

For the Liberals to have any chance in the soon-to-be-foisted-on-them election, they need voters thinking about something other than Adscam when they go to the polls. So tomorrow night, Paul Martin will elevate Adscam to the level of full-blown national crisis by interrupting your regularly scheduled programming to talk about it.

Brilliant.

Almost as brilliant, in fact, as thinking that your average, nine-to-five Canadian is going to flip on his TV after a hard day's work, find a wild-eyed politician whining about how hard his own party's scandal is on him, and say to himself "You know what? I really like this guy!"

If only someone had told these guys ten years ago that not every Canadian was a charter member of the Cult of Paul, they'd have saved themselves a lot of grief.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Listen to your (Clarity Act) daddy

I’ve put yesterday’s column up a bit quickly, because I honestly think it’s an important one…not so much for what I have to say, but for what Stéphane Dion offers.

Of course, the folks who really need to read it are no doubt too busy running their government and their party into the ground to take the time.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Martha, unplugged

Escaped Don Mills last night in time to catch Martha Wainwright at the Drake. So glad I did. If you thought my review of her disc was effusive, my review of her live show (if I were doing a full one, which, er, I’m not) would be all the more so.

I’m not sure how many live shows she’s doing purely acoustic, but it really should be all of them. In fact, I can’t quite figure out why she bothered with a band in the studio, either. There aren’t many voices that can carry an album on their own; hers, I think, would do quite nicely.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Tuesday April 19, 2005

Just another victim of the Martin Cabinet's surplus talent...

Our board met with Stephane Dion yesterday. The good news it that it gave me fodder for a short column on national unity (again) that’s in today’s Post. The bad news is that, aside from the 90 seconds or so he spent on unity (after I prompted him), the rest of the meeting was on Kyoto.

I really like Dion. But his heart’s clearly not in global warming. And his talents, from what I can see, are badly wasted in Environment.

This guy was born to do the job he was doing under Chretien. Not that Martin could’ve used him the past 16 months to put out fires in Quebec or anything…

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Monday April 18, 2005

What's good for the goose...

Media criticizing other media is immensely tiresome. And I really don’t buy into the notion that I have to spend all my time slagging the Globe and the Star and whoever else because I work at the Post. But I’m going to call the Globe on this one…today’s report on the Earsncliffe testimony (at least the online version) is seriously lame.

I’m not here to look out for Warren Kinsella…he can handle himself, including taking runs at myself and my colleagues where he sees fit. But effectively dismissing his testimony in the first paragraph by labeling him a “disgruntled former Liberal aide” smacks of cutting Martin too much slack.

It’s not that Warren isn’t a disgruntled former Liberal aide…he is, although I’m not sure that’s the way I’d describe him to someone who didn’t know him. But a couple of weeks ago, a disgruntled former ad exec facing criminal charges took the stand…and everyone, including the Globe, took his testimony at face value.

You want to believe the worst about Chrétien? Fair enough. I’m inclined to do likewise at this point. But don’t then turn and act as though Saint Paul is just being badmouthed by some hack with an axe to grind.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

I'll tell you what's scary...

This is so pathetic.

I don’t care how committed you are to national unity, or how uncomfortable you are with Stephen Harper – and I think you know where I stand on both fronts. If your intelligence isn’t insulted by Volpe’s claim that “Stephen Harper is a more ardent provincialist and separatist than even Gilles Duceppe,” you’re probably not smart enough to find your way to a polling station on election day.

I’m starting to think Martin’s Ontario lieutenant is more embarrassing than his Quebec one – and that’s saying something.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Saturday April 16, 2005

Housekeeping

Apologies for the sparse postings the past few days. Long days at work + late-night concerts + gorgeous weather + reflooring our place this weekend – as much enthusiasm as many of my colleagues for all the election buzz = a poor recipe for blogging.

Nevertheless, both Friday’s column and my first couple of recent CD reviews (Martha Wainwright ad The Bravery) are now onsite, so if you really need your fix…

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Tuesday April 12, 2005

Questionable questions

Are the Liberals in trouble? Duh. But in terms of where the public’s at right now, I still don’t think they’re in quite as much trouble as yesterday’s Ekos poll would suggest.

Thing is, the poll was conducted immediately after the Brault testimony was released. That’s like punching someone in the face, then asking what he thinks of you.

Ask right away, and the answer’s going to be pretty obvious. Suck up for a few weeks, ask again, and it might not be quite such a sure thing. Especially if you don’t ask a series of leading questions first.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

“Pardon me, sir, but I demand that you give me my orgasm”

I hate to pick on Michael Coren, but with columns like the one from this past weekend, it’s hard to resist.

It’s all pretty good, but nothing tops this: “Yet as talk turns to the choice of a new pope and future direction of the Church, failed Catholics and anti-Catholics in the West have now become united: ‘Give me my condoms, give me my orgasm, give me my new car, give me my painkillers, give me everything, give me.’"

I really can’t say anything that would add to this.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Random music notes

  • Last night’s Brendan Benson show was good, but not great. Given what an impressive catalogue he’s got for someone who’s only put out three albums (albeit over the course of nearly a decade), it’s pretty hard to go wrong – and he played most of it well. But the whole thing had a mildly half-assed feel to it…as though he could’ve taken it to a whole other level, but couldn’t quite be bothered.

    Also, I’m now more convinced than ever that Lapalco is the best thing he’s put out. Material from Alternative to Love (released last month) went over well, but they couldn’t quite touch the best from his second album.

  • You’ll note in today’s Post that we’re back to having longer CD reviews. I’ve gotten things started with a write-up of Martha Wainwright’s new disc…which, just in case you fail to pick up a print copy (for shame!), I highly recommend.

    Not sure exactly what portion of the reviews I’ll be doing, but should be fun.

  • The Bravery quite suck. The Killers are right, however lame their feud: The similarities between their debut discs are unmistakable. Except the thing is, the Bravery’s songs all sound like they came from the second half of Hot Fuss…the part where all the good stuff is over with, and the filler takes over. Except worse.

  • Short of Collective Soul, the new Garbage album has to be 2005’s least anticipated comeback from a major ’90s act. Unhip though it may be to admit it, though, it’s not entirely unlistenable. But then, they always were sort of quietly efficient, weren’t they?

  • While we’re on the subject of comebacks, as I said before, the new Oasis single is more catchy than overpowering. But even as someone who doesn’t watch a whole lot of videos (not sure why I keep posting about them lately), I have to say the video is pretty friggin’ cool.

  • >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



    Monday April 10, 2005

    Unsolicited advice

    If I’m the Conservatives, and I’m thinking about how to make sure Adscam knocks the Liberals straight into the ground, here’s what I come up with: Lay off Jean Chrétien.

    Seriously.

    Not that Chrétien isn’t the easiest target, and a perfectly deserving one at that. But we don’t need Stephen Harper to tell us what he did wrong – and frankly, I’m still not sure most Canadians outside Quebec will vote against Paul Martin because of the transgressions of a predecessor he’s not even on speaking terms with. What the Tories need to do is tell Canadians why they should be mad at Martin, not Chrétien.

    Reinforcing that he could’ve or should’ve known what was going on under his nose in Quebec is one way, but it’s hardly a sure winner. So what’s a better bet? Well, how ‘bout taking a closer look at a consulting company that served as the PM’s unofficial leadership headquarters while he was finance minister – even as it was bringing in copious amounts of cash from the Finance department?

    We’re not talking Adscam-scale here. Heck, everything may have been perfectly kosher. But if Harper hasn’t sicced every competent muck-raker at his disposal onto Earnscliffe, he’s passing up a golden opportunity.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

    Remember that whole "sky" thing?

    So it’s Sunday morning, a gorgeous spring day, the Jays are off to a promising start, I don’t have much planned for the afternoon, and I live within walking distance of the (ahem) Rogers Centre. It’s a no-brainer to head over there and enjoy the only sport that actually tends (at least for Jays fans) to be more fun at the start of the year than at the end.

    Except, for reasons that are completely beyond my comprehension, the Dome is closed. And somehow, sitting indoors on the nicest day so far this year doesn’t really grab me. So I give it a miss, passing up what would prove to be a great game…one that probably would have encouraged me to come back for another one soon.

    I know they’re trying – really trying – to get more fans in. But sometimes, it’s not the fancy new scoreboards that’ll do the trick – it’s the simple things, like letting an outdoor sport be played outdoors

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



    Friday April 8, 2005

    Even lame excuses are void

    What jumps out at me about the Brault testimony, beyond the obvious (and that it has the makings of a spectacularly bad Canadian made-for-TV movie – now casting for “The Choo Choo Man”), is that it somewhat blows up my previous theory that Adscam was largely the product of a party spending too long in power with too little opposition.

    If Brault’s testimony is accurate, the Liberals barely had time to get comfortable in office before all the wheeling and dealing started. It’s not as though winning a couple of elections without breaking a sweat made them fat and lazy; more like certain players, at least, saw the party’s first election win in 13 years as license to start cashing in.

    I’m not sure if this was a Liberal problem, or a Quebec Liberal problem, or a Quebec political culture problem (sorry, but the possibility has to at least be raised). But it looks to me less like some Liberals lost their moral compass than that they never had one in the first place.

    >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski


    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 1-7, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 25-31, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 18-24, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 11-17, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from February 25-March 10, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from February 11-24, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from January 28-February 10, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from January 14-27, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from December 31, 2004-January 13, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from December 17-30, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from December 3-16, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from November 19-December 2, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from November 5-18, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from October 22-November 4, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004





    Site best viewed using Internet Explorer

    Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.

    © Design and Content 2004
    All rights reserved.