Bio            Latest Column              Music              Archives              Links              Contact              Home   





























































































































Your privacy is important to us. Please read our Privacy Policy.



Radwanski's Ramblings...


Thursday June 23, 2005

Your tax dollars hard at work (,,,is what I’d say if I’d run out of fresh thoughts)

So last night, after watching most of the CFL opener (Cuthbert’s a big improvement on Wells at TSN, but the production values still suck), a friend and I grabbed a drink on the patio of the Wheat Sheaf, in my King/Bathurst ‘hood.

Wait…don’t go…this isn’t one of the blogosphere’s lame recaps of every mundane detail of some guy’s Wednesday night. See, if you live in downtown Toronto, you’ve probably noticed that Bathurst is out of action so the streetcar tracks can be torn up. Which is a pain in the ass for…well, lots of people. But apparently not the hard-working types I watched doing their thing at the “construction” site tonight.

Seven dudes…all of whom looked like they were using their equipment for the first time. At any given moment, at least four of them – and sometimes all seven - were standing around doing nothing. Honestly, I’ve never seen any workers, anywhere, turn up for work and immediately take a break…but that’s what all of these doofuses did before proceeding to stand around and either grin or glare at each other as they took turns half-heartedly taking a stab at their work before handing off to the next guy.

I’m generally not an anti-union sort of guy, at least not so much as to go on prolonged rants against them. But another couple of pints at the Wheat Sheaf, and I might well be.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Wednesday June 22, 2005

When Deep Purple speak, Paul Martin listens

Maybe it’s just the prospect of spending a day at Molson Park (which I quite dislike, and will continue to dislike, regardless of what they call it) with the likes of Motley Crue, Brian Adams, Our Lady Peace, a piped-in Celine Dion and the appalling Dan Aykroyd. Maybe if I were going to be in London, with REM and Razorlight and the Killers (we’ll overlook Sting, UB40, Keane and the rest), or Berlin with Green Day and Brian Wilson, or even Philly with, er, Jay-Z and the Kaiser Chiefs (hopefully together), I’d feel differently.

Mostly, though, I think it’s the sense that most of the performers understand a lot less about what they’re protesting than about the joys of free publicity. And the self-aggrandizing hectoring of Bob Geldof, which has gone from admirable to jaw-droppingly presumptuous. And the sense that, however many egos it feeds, this thing isn’t going to make a whit of difference when it comes to the long-term future of the people it’s supposedly helping.

Whatever it is, I’m starting to get bloody sick of Live 8 about now. I usually go for this do-gooder stuff, but there’s something a little icky about this one that I’m having trouble putting my finger on.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

While we're being cynical...

Is it fair game to point out that Billy Corgan’s sudden eagerness to reunite the Pumpkins seems to coincide with the murderous reviews his solo disc is getting, or should we just accept it took him this long to figure out Britney wasn’t really quite the invincible chart-topping force he took her for?

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

The real question about Shapiro...

When did we start giving ethics reports flashy names like “Many Shades of Grey?

In addition to the other bones he’s picked, has Ed Broadbent noticed that his new nemesis is making his reports sound like bad mystery novels?

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Tuesday June 21, 2005

Time-efficient blogging

The good.

The bad.

The painfully obvious.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Monday June 20, 2005

Dodging a bullet

Whew. Here I was, worried that Friday’s health care column would be dated by the time I got it up on site. But by some complete fluke, our national leaders managed not to talk about it this weekend, meaning my complaint still stands.

I have no doubt it’s a matter of days – maybe just hours – until Messrs Martin and Harper respond to the court’s decision with a bold plan to save medicare. So hurry up and read the column before they make me the fool.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Of course, if I were a celebrity hound, these are not the celebrities I would be hounding...

Gave the MMVAs a miss last night, save for watching the last few minutes on TV (credit to the Killers for bringing along the gospel choir). But briefly dropped by Universal’s post-awards party…just long enough to remind myself of why I avoided the show in the first place.

Nothing against the folks at the label…it was a successful party, as far as these things go, and it was nice of them to invite me. And if I was into following celebrities or immersing myself in the beautiful people, I’d have been all over this thing. But the only reason I write about music is that I like music, and this night was not for people of that mindset.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Sunday June 19, 2005

This time of year, you have to take your outrage where you can find it

Slow news day?

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

For previews of future columns, go here

Normally, I leave it to other people to poke fun at Sun columnists. But this is just too good to pass up.

It’s not exactly a state secret that Christina Blizzard is a bit of a mouthpiece for the provincial Tories. But it still takes some chutzpah to literally rewrite a Conservative press release for your entire column.

Some of the “50 broken promises” credited to the McGuinty Liberals are legit; others are a stretch; several toward the end are repetitions of ones earlier in the list. But if they were all 100% accurate, this would still be pretty gross.

Maybe this stuff sells with Sun readers. Who knows. But much as Christina seems like a nice enough person from my few brief encounters with her, I don’t know how she gets up in the morning passing this stuff off as journalism.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Housekeeping

A bit overdue, I’ve updated my music page. CD reviews, NXNE wrap-up, Oasis interview…all now available for your reading pleasure.

On the Oasis front, Friday’s show was a good time… big, beautiful sound, the usual impressive stage presence, and a very enthusiastic crowd. One question, though: Is the closing cover of My Generation really still necessary? When you’ve got a back catalogue like theirs, it’s a little anti-climactic to end with a perfunctory version of someone else’s song.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Friday June 17, 2005

But please, tell us more about the South Beach diet

Hey…anybody remember some kind of court ruling last week…something about health insurance?

Just asking because, you know, I was scanning all the news pages in every paper yesterday, and couldn’t find a single story about it. Lots about Stephen Harper’s BBQ plans, but zero, zip and zilch - pretty well par for the course this week - on what our national leaders intend to do to save/restructure/dismantle the national institution that supposedly defines us.

Glad to see all the priorities are perfectly straight in Ottawa. More on this in today’s Post column.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Possibly wimpy, possibly inept, but certainly not inept at being wimpy

It's not entirely clear whether the Liberals are deliberately putting off the same-sex marriage bill to appease the Conservatives and their own backbenchers, or merely because they're too uninspired/incompetent to get it through. Although the first would be worse, it’s pretty unfortunate either way.

By my count, gay marriage is the only controversial issue on which this government has taken something approximating a principled stand. If Martin runs for cover on this one, too, every liberal-minded Canadian should join Alex Munter and his plastic backbone on the Hill.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

F---in' A

Yesterday was a lot of fun. Sadly, I didn’t have my tape recorder on for Liam Gallagher’s explanation as to whether they have Guinness at the top of the CN Tower. But for the Oasis fans (and yes, I know from the e-mails that at least a few of you stop by here), some choice bits from Noel that I couldn’t fit into my piece in today’s Post, with a warning that the language may not be quite as family-friendly as you’ve grown accustomed to in these parts…

  • On positive reaction to the new album: “I’ve gotta say, it’s not been unexpected. Maybe in the past, we’ve been kind of waiting for bad reviews, and thinking ‘well, I can see what they mean by that.’ But this one, I was expecting them to be good.”

  • On the band’s past and future: “It’s not essential to make plans for Oasis. We kind of had a plan in ’94 of what we were going to do until ’97. After that, it’s just…we do what we fucking want, man…We’re never going to go away now. It’s not like Razorlight could take two years off and come back with an album, ’cause people would’ve completely forgotten who the fuck they are.”

  • On Coldplay: “I think Coldplay are at that point now where we were in ’97, where they’ve kind of transcended themselves …I don’t envy the position they’re in, because what happens is you know before you sit down to write a note that all these songs are going to be played in football stadiums…so you have to justify playing to 80,000 people. So all these songs become really overblown and grandiose. And I think that’s where Coldplay are at now. You listen to one song and you’re exhausted by the end of it. You listen to the first song on the album and you think ‘where the fuck is that going to go?”

  • On Be Here Now: “I know the lack of effort I put into the lyrics on that record, and it could do with having a lot less guitar solos on it. But it’s a snapshot of the times … Be Here Now was kind of a sin, really, because we were trying to make something massive out of something that really wasn’t. And we shouldn’t have even been in the studio – we should’ve been off going to India or something like that.”

  • On self-criticism: “John Lennon was always slagging off everything that he ever recorded apart from Across the Universe - and if that don’t show what a fucking idiot he was, I don’t know what does.”

  • On lyrics: "I’m kind of in between. Whereas Chris Martin will try and sum up the meaning of life and the universe and all surrounding galaxies in three-and-a-half minutes – at the other end of that was me just being drunk writing and thinking it was really, really, really fucking funny. Somewhere between the two is where I think you kind of end up, you know what I mean?”

  • On creative output: “We don’t live to work – we work to live … There’s no point in carrying on endlessly with tours around the world, so your audience becomes that familiar with you that one night they don’t fucking show up ’cause they know you’re going to be coming back next year. If I’m on the road for the year, then I’m going to spend at least half of the next year sitting on my ass doing fuck-all, because that’s what it’s all about.”

  • On drugs: "I don’t think it’s helped in any way to not be on drugs. It’s just, I can’t be bothered. You spend too much energy trying to buy the fucking things.”

  • On progressing: “At the end of the last session, I remember saying Heathen Chemistry was kind of a third of the way of where we were going to be on the next album. And this is kind of halfway of where we’re going to be on the next one. So we’re still kind of moving forward.”

  • >> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski


    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 10-16, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 3-9, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 20-June 2, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 13-19, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 29-May 12, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 22-28, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 8-21, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 1-7, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 25-31, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 18-24, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 11-17, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from February 25-March 10, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from February 11-24, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from January 28-February 10, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from January 14-27, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from December 31, 2004-January 13, 2005

    Radwanski's Ramblings from December 17-30, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from December 3-16, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from November 19-December 2, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from November 5-18, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from October 22-November 4, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004

    Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004





    Site best viewed using Internet Explorer

    Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.

    © Design and Content 2004
    All rights reserved.