Bio            Latest Column              CD Reviews              Archives              Links              Contact              Home   





























































































































Your privacy is important to us. Please read our Privacy Policy.



Radwanski's Ramblings...


Wednesday June 23, 2004

Is it self-promotion if you're already on my site?

Last Friday's Citizen column is now available in the usual place. If you're inclined to lean leftward, I hope it offers some food for thought in light of this.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Demand better answers

Stephen Harper must be regretting ever agreeing to last night's CBC Q&A after Peter Mansbridge backed him into a corner on Iraq and wouldn't let him out. Harper's supporters will take this as another example of the public broadcaster being out to get them. But they'd do better to question why we're a month into the campaign and their guy still hasn't come up with a decent line on the one question he knew he'd be asked.

Everyone in the country knows that, if he'd been PM, Harper would have sent troops to Iraq (so, probably, would Paul Martin, but at least he didn't spell it out for the Wall Street Journal). So why, every time the topic comes up, does he get that shifty look and claim that he supported the war but wouldn't/couldn't have sent Canadian forces? Why not just admit that, knowing what he knew then, he would've sent troops, but knowing what he knows now, he wouldn't?

The answer is that, for all the talk about his forthrightness, Harper is no more upstanding a politician than Martin. Remember that he's spent the past week - including the leaders' debate, by the way - knowingly misrepresenting his rivals' positions to give the impression they think child porn is acceptable. So do you really expect him to be a straight shooter when it comes to Iraq?

Update: Yesterday, Harper also claimed that Martin "could have said no" when Dalton McGuinty told him about Ontario's new health premiums. Really? How would that have worked, exactly, considering that they don't violate the Canada Health Act? Oh well...no point letting that get in the way of a good opportunity to dupe voters into confusing federal and provincial policy.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Finally, a politician who does things differently. Very differently.

Most politicians' blogs are a complete waste of time - feeble attempts to connect which some lowly staffer has put a few spare minutes into. Ken Dryden's, on the other hand, is one of the most earnest, apolitical things I've ever seen from someone running for public office. Weird, but kind of endearing.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Cancel that vacation day...

So much for Lollapalooza. Too bad...I was actually looking forward to it. Here's hoping Modest Mouse tour on their own instead, which I'd look forward to even more.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




Tuesday June 22, 2004

Must-see TV?

This, as Stephen LeDrew would say, is as dumb as a bag of hammers.

Just in case our federal and provincial leaders might occasionally be temped to stop grandstanding and actually get down to business when they're away from the cameras, let's make sure they never have the chance. That's a helluva plan to fix our health care system.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Sunday June 20, 2004

Gettin' Jacked

Back from my second rally of the weekend (to borrow from the immortal Kim Mitchell, I am indeed a wild party). This time it was the Layton/Broadbent affair in Toronto, and let's just say it was a little different from Friday's Martin/Zack from Canadian Idol extravaganza.

Actually, the NDP event had just about as many glitches as the Liberal one. Both Layton and Broadbent were more than fashionably late, the "Ed's Back" video (which desparately needs to be retired anyway) was beset by technical glitches, and the arrival of Foodshare's Debbie Field in the middle of the proceedings to ask attendees to take out their pens and list all the great things about the NDP campaign (and give money) was a bit of a disaster.

Even so, it was pretty hard not to be impressed. Broadbent's speech was decent, the energetic introduction of local candidates worked out nicely, and Layton looked a whole lot better than anyone who watched his debate performances would have reasonably expected. Good applause lines, no notes, and a focus on local issues (something Martin didn't even bother to attempt the other night).

The real difference, though, was the crowd. I've been to enough Liberal events to expect an audience that cheers a lot, but somehow manages to stay unengaged. This was much, much different. For a Canadian political crowd, these folks were downright rowdy. In fact, their enthusiasm was so infectious that you came away thinking that New Democrats will win half the seats in Toronto.

They won't, of course. In the city proper, they'll be lucky to win four. And nationally, 30 out of 308 would be a huge breakthrough. But in '93 or '99 or 2000, this sort of gathering - the turnout, the energy, and the general competence - would have been unfathomable. Whatever Layton's shortcomings, say this for him: He has injected some life back into his party.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




Saturday June 19, 2004

Memo to Herle: You're not the candidate

Quick quiz: Who's running the Conservative campaign?

Stumped? How 'bout the NDP's? Don't know that one either, huh? What about Chrétien's in 2000...or Jean Charest's in 2003...or Dalton McGuinty's the same year?

Unless you're involved in one of these campaigns, or you follow this stuff for a living, you're not going to know any of these. And that's by design...the campaigns know that they have to put one face forward, and they know that face should be the leader, not his strategists.

Which brings us to the next question: Why is David Herle becoming a household name?

It's not just the screw-up and subsequent capitulation with Marzolini, though that was pretty priceless. It's Herle popping up, day after day, with his name in print. Everywhere you look, he's acknowledging the Liberals' woes, or playing the blame game, or finding some other way to prepare for his post-Martin life as a pundit.

I'm not behind the scenes, so I don't know if Herle's performance merits being turfed, as some Liberals think. But I do know that they need to tell him to put a sock in it. His fascination with hearing his own voice has hindered the Liberal campaign from the outset.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

The requisite CFL post

Three games this season. Three Eastern victories over Western teams, including the Ticats, of all people, besting the Lions. And Montreal, still arguably the best in the East, still hasn't played yet. It's a bit early to tell, but it looks like there may be a power shift.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski




Friday June 18, 2004

Like most people, I really know how to cut loose after work on Fridays...

Just back from the Liberals' rally in Etobicoke, such as it was. Since I'm in Toronto writing/editing stuff, rather than on the road, this was the first Martin event I've caught live during the campaign. So, if not entirely original, my impressions might be a little fresher than those of the poor bastards following him around 24/7 trying to find something new to say about his stump speeches.

I could focus on what Martin had to say, but that - like the speech itself - wouldn't be very interesting. It was standard stuff, reasonably well-delivered but entirely vacuous. And he's still on about the bloody aircraft carriers, which is starting to get really tiresome.

Now, as for everything else, let's just say a lot has changed since 2000.

Tiny crowd, overflowing only because the organizers wisely booked a room rather than a hall (this week's rally of chiropractic patients at Queen's Park drew more people). Zero energy. And as for the presentaion, total amateur hour.

Say what you will about the old Chretien crowd, but they knew how to throw a rally. There'd be a crisp introduction, a solid entrance, and by the time the PM got to the stage the energy level would be peaking.

Tonight, the proceedings begin with Jean Augustine taking the stage with an extremely dull ramble about pluralism that somehow manages to incorporate the word "E-day," which I've never heard used in a speech before. The audience is polite, but unengaged.

Augustine gives way to Albina Guarnieri, who can barely be seen from behind the microphone. Even she doesn't seem quite why she's there, other than to annoint Martin the "comeback kid" and to introduce fellow MP Sam Bulte.

Except when she introduces Bulte, Bulte's not there. Apparently someone forgot to explain the sequence of events to Albina, because the next thing Paul Martin is bursting through the door, led by a handful of rather uncomfortable looking teenagers wearing oversized t-shirts that read "Hands off my Charter" and "MRIs not M16s".

Usually, you can tell the candidate has entered the room when the campaign music starts blaring. But not this time. Instead, the theme from Rocky - already playing since Albina was doing her thing (comeback kid...get it?) - continues to play quietly in the background. That is, until Martin is halfway through the crowd and it reaches the end of the song. At that point, we get about 20 seconds of silence from the speakers before Martin's theme song (a rip-off of the New Radicals' one hit) finally comes on.

By the time he gets to the stage, the crowd is finally stirring to life. But then Bulte turns up to give a blustery introduction to...Zack Werner from Canadian Idol.

I have no idea who thought this was a good idea. But for several minutes, Martin stands there cooling his heels while our man Zack gives the equivalent of a really lame "Rock the Vote" pitch. Mostly, he sets about finding really contrived ways to compare politics to his extremely important job of being Simon Cowell's cheap non-union Canadian equivalent. Oh, and he wants us to "represent."

With a different audience - 14-year-old girls, maybe - this might go over a little better. But mostly, we're talking about middle-aged multicultural types who've probably never watched American Idol, let alone Canadian Idol. I'm not even sure they'd be all that excited if Bono turned up again (isn't he do for his weekly visit?), let alone this.

By the time Zack hands the PM the mike, the damage has been done. The crowd does its best, but whatever energy there was is gone. When Martin wraps up, there's no buzz in the air - just a small crowd gathered outside to watch him board his bus.

In the end, it's all a little sad - kinda like in Spinal Tap, when the crowds are getting smaller and the venues are getting sketchier and the band soliders on because it doesn't know what else to do. Only somehow, I don't think Martin is going to find out at the end of this movie that they still love him in Japan.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

But they're still shocked by the Liberals' negative campaigning

So the Conservatives have now officially fallen deep into the gutter. The attack on the NDP, which they've still yet to retract, tells the story.

This, for my money, is at least as bad as Layton's attempt to pin homeless deaths on Martin - probably worse. It'll be interesting to see if Harper gets half as hard a time from our supposedly left-wing media.

In the meanwhile, the NDP response sums things up quite nicely. I wouldn't usually post the entire text of a press release, but this one is particularly effective:

NO, WE DON'T SUPPORT CHILD PORN

OTTAWA — On the day after a killer confessed to the child porn-related rape and murder of a 10-year-old girl, the Conservative Party issued a release asking whether the NDP caucus supports child pornography.

The answer: No.

The NDP does not support child pornography.

And it is hard to imagine a worse day to play politics with this issue.

Instead, as NDP Leader Jack Layton said earlier in this campaign, the NDP supports tough action on child pornography.

This includes building on a program pioneered by the NDP government in Manitoba to report child porn websites, to have them shut down, and to have their creators prosecuted.

Stephen Harper's Conservatives are referring to a debate in Parliament on the issue of what judges can consider "artistic merit" when hearing cases. We trust the courts to be able to make the distinction between art (for example, images of nude angels seen in ecclesiastical art) and images of sexual assaults on children.

In addition to the Internet proposal set out by Mr. Layton in this campaign, the NDP has on two occasions introduced The Internet Child Pornography Prevention Act to address this issue. The NDP's bill proposed to license Internet service providers and ensure that they co-operated to minimize the use of the Internet for the publication and proliferation of child pornography. It would also restrict those who have committed serious child sex offences from access to the Internet.


Well said.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Klees mania

I'm getting a lot of angry correspondence from Frank Klees supporters about yesterday's provincial column, available for free (!) on the Post's website. Apparently, they've taken exception to my description of their man as "a well-liked MPP, but hardly a force to be reckoned with."

For the record, I stand by my analysis. But full credit to them for their enthusiasm. And in fairness, I had heard before I wrote the piece that he's got a bit more support than one might think. At the very least, he's got more vocal support than one would think.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004





Site best viewed using Internet Explorer

Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.

© Design and Content 2004
All rights reserved.