|
Thursday May 27, 2004
Caccia gotcha?
So you're Mario Silva, Liberal candidate in Davenport. You've punted Trudeau-era minister Charles Caccia - a guy who's held the seat since the '60s, and is known in some circles as the "conscience" of your party - out of the way at your nomination meeting, with the blessings of the Martinites, but you're going to need Caccia's old supporters to vote for you if you want to keep the riding. So you make nice, say good things about him at the door, pretend to respect him, and hope there's not too much backlash...right?
Not if your Mario. Then, you belittle him to The Globe. "I would be worried if I was getting his name at the doors," you say. "But quite frankly, his name doesn't register."
Did I mention that Caccia is thinking of running as an independent, quite possibly paving the way for an NDP upset? No doubt being made fun of in a national newspaper will convince him to back off.
>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski
Wednesday May 26, 2004
The view from here
The word from media on Stephen Harper's bus is that the Conservative leader's campaign is going smashingly so far. Chained to a desk in Don Mills, I can't dispute what they're seeing first hand. But when you're following a tour that closely, it's sometimes a bit hard to see the forest for the trees. More succinctly, it's hard to get an accurate feel for what the rest of the country is seeing.
My point? Judging from the evening newscasts, which is how most Canadians get their coverage (if at all), Harper looks flat as hell. Flatter than Martin. Flatter than Layton. Flatter than he looked, at least occasionally, heading into the campaign.
Memo to Mr. Harper: Look up from your notes more often. Burn that horrible brown suit, if you haven't already. Try not to look like you're boring yourself. And start showing the rest of us whatever it is you're showing the reporters when the cameras are off.
>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski
Tuesday May 25, 2004
A little too Jacked up
If the New Democrats think Jack Layton is their best asset, they're probably right. But somebody might want to tell them that he's not their only asset. It's all fine and dandy to put your leader front and centre, but you know you've gone a bit overboard when not a single candidate from the other 307 ridings can be found one your party's website.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Open up!
Sometime in the next few weeks, some very earnest people bearing clipboards, buttons and brochures will turn up at your door. They'll ask you how you're planning on voting, shove campaign literature at you, and possibly keep ringing your bell if you don't answer it the first time. Most likely, they will annoy you.
I'm here to suggest you cut them some slack. However much you may dislike the candidates, their parties, or the system in general, you have to respect those volunteers out there braving your hostility. They honestly believe in what they're doing, they're (usually) not getting paid for it, and they're probably more scared of you than you are of them. Many are students, others are recent immigrants, and almost all of them are dyed-in-the-wool optimists.
I speak from experience here: Canvassing is not an easy thing to do. Once, when I was helping run a local campaign a few years ago, I gave a young couple canvassing for the first time a pep talk and sent them out the door. Fifteen minutes later they came back in, looking sheepish, and asked if they could put up lawn signs instead. It turned out they'd gotten in the car, tried to prepare by asking each other questions they might hear at the door, and so freaked themselves out that they hightailed it back to the sanctuary of the campaign office.
All this is a long-winded way of asking you to take a minute to hear them out. In their own way, they're doing their part to make democracy work. There's no point in discouraging civic participation when a bit of courtesy is all that's being asked of you.
And one more thing...try to have some clothes on when you answer the door. It's hard enough for the canvassers to make their case without having to deal with other distractions.
>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski
Monday May 24, 2004
Note: "masochistic in their willingness to embarrass themselves" is not an endorsement
My column from Saturday's Citizen is now available on-site.
I usually wait a bit longer to post them, but given that the news is going to be moving a little faster for the next five weeks, better to get it up before it's completely dated. Also, this one seems to be drawing quite a bit of reaction, judging from my inbox.
Unfortunately, some of that reaction has been a little off the deep end. For the record, I am not shilling for the Liberals. If you don't believe me, I have nasty correspondence from David Herle to prove it.
>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski
Sunday May 23, 2004
Okay, maybe not "back him up" exactly...
The big story of Day 1 seems to be that Martin is an idiot for calling an early election. But I'll back him up here, at least a bit.
It may be a mistake to go to the polls now, but the mistake was made months ago. Having set the expectation that there would be a spring vote, he would've looked cowardly putting it off till fall or beyond. The story would've become that he was dodging the inevitable, and that voters were being forced to wait another few months to kick him out. By the end of summer, he would've been dead man walking.
The only possible benefit to waiting would have been to strut his stuff by doing some vigorous governing. But that would have required a few policies, maybe even one of those tricky agenda things...and by this point, it's safe to say there's a better chance of Warren Kinsella being brought in to run Martin's war room than of these guys coming up with any fresh ideas.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
More sports chuckles
Jays fans, if there are any left, will appreciate a story recounted by a friend (not the same one who recommended the arena football site...I do have more than one) last night.
It's late in the evening, he's strolling along Blue Jay Way, and he stumbles onto GM JP Ricciardi.
"JP," he says, "what's wrong with the Jays?"
JP sympathizes, acknowledges slump, etc. But my friend has one beef in particular.
"What's wrong with Carlos?" he says. "He's killing me in my pool!" JP grants that he's in a slump, but my friend isn't giving up. "You gotta understand," he says, "I've got $20 on this thing!"
"Twenty dollars?" the GM replies. "He's costing me seventeen million."
That's gold, JP. Gold.
>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004
Site best viewed using Internet Explorer
Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.
© Design and Content 2004
All rights reserved.
|