|
Wednesday October 26, 2005
Guaranteed to be fascinating for those living outside the centre of the universe
I’ve done two columns for the Post this week on crime in Toronto, pegged to the Ipsos Reid “Pulse of Toronto” poll we’re running. Yesterday’s entry is now here; today’s to follow.
It occurs to me, in hindsight, that a bit of clarification on the first one might be in order. When it comes to the danger of middle-class residents fleeing troubled neighbourhoods, it’s not really downtown Toronto I’m talking about for the most part. Really, it’s mostly areas of the suburbs – not up in 905, but in Scarborough, North York, Etobicoke, etc.
Hence the comparison to “white flight” in the U.S. might be a little confusing, since that applies largely to downtowns. In this case, my reference to the “core” just means Toronto proper, as opposed to the surrounding area.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
“Sick of the radio? Go indie!”
Tart Cider follows up on my Broken Social Scene chart-topping concerns from the other day. He’s right: It’s really an issue of branding. But this whole indie-as-a-mainstream-genre is getting out of control.
First, Rogers started devoting a section of one of its on-demand channels to indie videos (no other genre gets the same treatment). Now, from the nice people who tack massive service charges onto the cheapest concert tickets (very indie!), there’s this.
It’s lovely to see good music getting the attention it deserves. But if Arts and Crafts takes over next year’s Edgefest, I’m gonna start to get seriously freaked out.
(Speaking of indie bands that do deserve attention, my brief Lovely Feathers piece from Monday's Post is now here. Does my commission kick in soon?)
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Tuesday October 25, 2005
Dirty pool
The press gallery dinner is one of the few events at which the Ottawa crowd actually acts human. For one night, leaders of all stripes are likeable - stepping away from their scripts and poking fun at themselves and each other. But the federal Tories may have just killed it.
Once upon a time, the gallery dinner was off-record. That hasn't been the case for some years, but it's generally been understood that anything and everything said there is off limits as far as political fodder. At least, that's the understanding of everyone who doesn't work in Stephen Harper's office, which appears to have missed that message.
Yesterday, the Tories sent out a press release that used Jack Layton's speech against him, stealing the NDP leader's self-deprecating take on If I Had a Million Dollars for the headline and directly mentioning his gallery speech at the end of it. In fact, the entire release appears to have been prompted by Layton's turn at the mic.
I usually don't get too hung up on Ottawa etiquette, but I can't emphasize enough what an appalling breach that is. Humourlessness and unprofessionalism are two of the hallmarks of Harper's office, and they both came through in spades on this one.
Anyway, here it is. I trust you''ll all be suitably indignant:
“If I had $4.6 billion – I’d buy some votes”
OTTAWA – Yesterday NDP leader Jack Layton claimed he didn’t care who received credit for funding announcements resulting from the Liberal-NDP backroom deal. “You know, I'm not concerned about that. We came here to get something done for Canadians. We always said if we have a central role in Parliament, and with our rather small caucus, although we had two million votes, we're there to deliver for people and I'm not concerned about who gets credit for things. The voters in the end know who did what when and we'll live with their judgement.” (CTV Question Period, October 23, 2005). Yet this is the same Jack Layton who complained last week about not getting enough credit! Don’t you wish $4.6 billion could buy you some time in the spotlight?
Points to consider:
Jack Layton complained about the Liberals not including him in funding announcements resulting from their backroom budget deal. “I made one mistake and that is when the NDP signed an alliance with the Liberals in Ontario in the 1980s, in exchange for support, they said that the role of the NDP had to be acknowledged. Silly me. I didn't make that requirement. We don't even get invited to the announcements.” (National Post, October 18, 2005).
Layton has actually participated in funding announcements with the Liberals. Infrastructure and Communities Minister John Godfrey invited NDP leader Jack Layton to join him in Gatineau on June 1st to announce the details of the amended Liberal budget's $800-million for transit. (National Post, June 2, 2005)
Looks like $4.6 billion can’t buy Jack Layton a seat in the Liberal Cabinet, or a meaningful role in Liberal photo-ops. As he sang to the national media on Saturday night, next time he’ll spend $4.6 billion to buy some votes. Last time all it bought was more time for the corrupt Liberals.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Monday October 24, 2005
Note: Lots of less worthy (read: more fun) posts below
I’m not going to claim it was my Friday column that did it, although I find it an amusing (if extremely slim) possibility. But if you want a prime example of a newspaper feeling compelled to weigh in on a topic without actually having anything to say about it, check out yesterday’s Star editorial on the Conference Board’s report.
When your headline is “Canada’s future rides on right policy mix,” you know you’re in trouble. But then, most of us are in the same boat. We know the Conference Board is right about Canada’s global competitiveness, but short of using the report to peddle their own pet causes, nobody’s quite sure where to start with the major structural changes needed to make any real difference.
If there’s any room for optimism on this at all, maybe it’s in the fact that we’re a little closer to at least starting to think about these things than we were this time last week.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
CBC Sports watch (I)
Thought of going to Montreal for Saturday’s Argos/Als game and didn’t, which I’m somewhat regretting on two fronts. First, I missed a fantastic Argos win – as dominant as I can remember them being against a good team. And second, I was left watching the atrocious CBC broadcast.
I often pick on TSN for their football coverage, mostly because their colour commentators are an embarrassment. But “embarrassment” is pretty well the only word that comes to mind thinking about the entire CBC broadcast.
For the entire first half, and a chunk of the second, CBC couldn’t even manage to get the score or the game clock onto the screen – and since Mark Lee rarely deigned to tell us, it was impossible to know how much time was left, even in the dying minutes (and seconds) of the first half. The virtual first-down line, now a staple on virtually every professional football broadcast, was usually nowhere to be found – turning up spontaneously every few plays, then disappearing again. The camera work and production was often shoddy. The crowd wasn’t miked properly for much of the game, negating the atmosphere that comes with having 51,000-plus in the stands. And even on the game’s most exciting plays, Lee sounded about as excited as if he were calling a pre-season game – not one of the CFL’s biggest games of the year.
Thankfully, the quality of CFL contests tends to make up for the amateurish way they’re broadcast. That’s why ratings remain extremely high. But there’s no excuse for our national broadcaster doing such a half-assed job of covering the Canadian game. If the CBC’s not up to the challenge, let someone else do it.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
CBC Sports watch (II)
I’m not a Don Cherry fan, but I thought Tony Keller’s piece making the gleefully contrarian case for him in the Post’s Public Intellectuals series was nicely done. So I was glad to see the piece (and the paper) get some free publicity from Cherry and Ron MacLean during Saturday night’s Leafs/Flyers game. But it did drive home a quibble that I had with the op-ed.
Like every other Cherry fan, Tony made the usual claim that “at sports bars across the land, the TV volume gets turned up and the room falls quiet” during Coach’s Corner. Having been in a fair number of sports bars, admittedly more so in Toronto than across the land, I’ve never really noticed this to be the case. The volume does get turned up, but the only time I’ve noticed him holding the rapt attention of the room is when there’s some particularly salacious controversy to be discussed.
Ironically, I had trouble actually hearing what Cherry had to say about Tony’s profile of him on Saturday. Why? Because I was at a bar, and everyone was talking.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Random music notes
I’m having a lot of trouble wrapping my mind around Broken Social Scene’s disc topping the Toronto sales charts.
On one hand, it should be cause for celebration – much as I’m not in love with the album myself, it says a lot about the appetite for quality music that the least accessible indie band imaginable is besting Nickelback.
But the inaccessibility is the thing. I get why, say, the Arcade Fire is enjoying mainstream success. But to enjoy the BSS album, you have to be enough of a music geek to listen to it many, many times over – something that takes a lot of time, patience and commitment (possibly more time, patience and commitment than I have, but that’s beside the point). Do most of the Torontonians laying down the cash in record stores actually fit that description, or do we have an inordinate amount of confused bandwagon jumping going on here?
I was already looking forward to Jenny Lewis’ solo disc; the promised Traveling Wilburys cover should seal the deal. Seriously, who doesn’t love Handle with Care?
I have some serious doubts about the Arctic Monkeys, the latest Brit rockers allegedly poised to conquer the world. But I feel compelled to check out their show at Lee’s Palace next month. If anyone wants to take a crack at convincing me not to, I’ll welcome it.
Another reason to like Metric - Pitchfork is telling us not to.
My review of last week’s Franz Ferdinand show at the Ricoh is now here.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Friday October 21, 2005
A la prochain
I contributed regularly to Saturday Night in the early days of its reincarnation, then stopped for a while, then restarted again recently. So I got to know many of the people involved - not quite as well as I’d have liked, but well enough to feel awfully bad for them today, with news that the magazine is suspending operations.
Canada’s magazine industry is virtually impossible to survive in for all but the behemoths – something I know well from researching the feasibility of a print startup back in the Pundit days. But I have the utmost respect and admiration for anyone who tries to prove that wrong. These folks did, they produced some pretty good content, and while we’ll be poorer for not having them around, we owe them a debt of gratitude for giving it their best shot.
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
>> Send your comments to
Adam Radwanski
Radwanski's Ramblings from October 7-20, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 23-October 6, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 9-22, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 2-8, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from August 19-September 1, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from August 5-18, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 22-August 4, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 15-21, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 8-14, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 1-7, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 24-30, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 16-23, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 10-16, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 3-9, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 20-June 2, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 13-19, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 29-May 12, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 22-28, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 8-21, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 1-7, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from March 25-31, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from March 18-24, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from March 11-17, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from February 25-March 10, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from February 11-24, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from January 28-February 10, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from January 14-27, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from December 31, 2004-January 13, 2005
Radwanski's Ramblings from December 17-30, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from December 3-16, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from November 19-December 2, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from November 5-18, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from October 22-November 4, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004
Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004
Site best viewed using Internet Explorer
Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.
© Design and Content 2004
All rights reserved.
|