Bio            Latest Column              Music              Archives              Links              Contact              Home   





























































































































Your privacy is important to us. Please read our Privacy Policy.



Radwanski's Ramblings...


Thursday June 30, 2005

A quick reminder...

This comments site seems to be in full swing, which is great. By all means, go there and say your piece as often as you like. But just so there’s no confusion, bear in mind that only my purely political postings turn up there – not the self-indulgent ramblings on music, the CFL, etc. So if you’re into the self-indulgent ramblings, make sure to keep on stopping by ’round these parts.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Puzzler of the day

Pretty boring provincial Cabinet shuffle. Just one question: Mike Colle? You’ve got two precious spots to hand out to the very best and brightest among your backbenchers, and Mike Colle makes the cut?

>>
 Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Bad to worse?

I was about to say this was a good thing for Harper, considering his communications have nowhere to go but up. Then I got to the part about Carolyn Stewart Olsen. Yikes.

Here’s a tip: Hire a people person for this job. Someone who doesn’t see a bogeyman in the corner of every newsroom. Someone who doesn’t reinforce all the leader’s worst, most paranoid instincts.

Loyalty is a nice trait. But it ain’t gonna win you too many elections.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Speaking of brilliant Conservative messaging...

Nice.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Spinning an old tune

I’ve been under the impression that the last couple of years have been pretty darned good ones for music – considerably better than, say, the mid-late ’80s, or that terrifying period of the late ’90s. But the good people at Spin, perhaps showing their age just a wee bit, would appear to disagree.

You’d think that, in this month’s rundown of the “100 greatest albums” of the past two decades, the last five years would at least come somewhere close to a 25% share. But on the entire list, there’s a grand total of just 11 from 2000-2005. And precisely three – yes, three - from this decade made the Top 50.

Of those, the highest is Outkast’s Stankonia at #23; next up is Kanye West at #45. It’s not until #48 that a recent rock album (or whatever exactly you want to call Kid A is) makes the cut. 2002, ’03 and ’04 get one entry each on the entire list; the current year has none.

Granted, recent years haven’t lived up to the early-mid ’90s explosion, what with grunge and Britpop and whatever else exploding in rapid succession. But how to explain that ’85-89 lands six of the top 10, 22 of the top 50, and 32 total? And no, it’s not just rap’s move into the mainstream that did it; this is Spin, remember, so it’s a rock-heavy list.

The point of such lists is obviously to get people like me engaged enough to go on prolonged rants about what didn’t make the cut. But even so, I maintain this one’s unusually perplexing. In part, Spin’s editors seem to be on some kind of nostalgia trip; they also seem terrified of looking dumb down the road by going out on a limb with recent discs that might not hold up, instead dumping the likes of Franz Ferdinand, the New Pornographers, Bright Eyes, Dizzee Rascal, the Arcade Fire and Coldplay into a sidebar of “ten recent albums that may also stand the test of time.”

Anyway, enough of that. Sometime over the weekend, I’m going to try to list off a few of my favourite discs and shows from the first half of the year. Then y’all can have a go at me…though if I entice this long a response, I’ll be pretty pleased with myself.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski


Wednesday June 29, 2005

Can it really be over?

We haven’t been able to say this much the past year – or longer, really – but yesterday was a day we could actually take pride in this country’s politicians.

Some of then, anyway. Point is, we’re one of only a handful of countries to take a progressive step that I suspect most others will have taken ten or twenty years from now. Good on us. It might not be enough to get us another fawning Economist cover, but hopefully some of us can stop the self-flagellation long enough to celebrate it.

Interesting question, though: What now? For members of my generation, gay rights is the closest thing to a domestic civil rights battle we’ve had – and one of the few issues that’s engaged youngish non-political types. Now, it’s pretty well resolved…which, I suspect, could lead to even more apathy toward politics than we’ve seen to date.

Not saying some other struggle should be invented out of thin air. Just saying, is all.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Gay marriage as a separatist plot

In debates with colleagues, and those I’ve been following from a bit of a distance, the common defence of Harper’s Bloc/gay marriage attacks is that it’s no different from the Liberals’ claims that the Tories were wrong to align with the Bloc to try to bring them down. I see where they’re coming from, but it just didn’t hold up.

Yes, the Grit claims of a Tory-Bloc love-in were facile. But there was at least a germ of truth somewhere in there, since the Conservatives’ and Bloc’s only mutual interest was immediately capitalizing on Gomery’s Adscam revelations – in the Tories’ case to win power, and in the separatists’ to tighten their stranglehold on Quebec while wiping the province’s federalists off the map. On the policy front, they had very little in common (with the possible exception of a weaker central government, but that was somewhat beside the point).

On gay marriage, the Bloc is a left-of-centre party with progressive social values, representing a province that shares those values, taking a position that it’s held for a long time. Martin didn’t strike some sort of cynical deal with Duceppe to align on the issue, and the Bloc’s vote had nothing to do with its desire to break up the country. They just happened to be coming from the same place.

Oh…and one other difference in the attacks, too. In Martin’s case, it was part of a carefully constructed (if immensely cynical) strategy, articulated reasonably coherently. In Harper’s, it was a couple of sentences huffed out seemingly out of the blue.

To some eyes, that might make Harper the more sincere of the two. Maybe so. But it also proves yet again what a lousy, undisciplined politician he is.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Damning with faint praise

Unfashionable though this may be to point out, the Neil Young addition means Barrie might well have the best Live 8 lineup outside London. Seriously

I’m pretty sure this is more an indictment of the across-the-board talent selection than a feather in Michael Cohl’s cap. But it’s not really about the music, right? I mean, we can’t rely on rock stars alone to help us achieve this thing’s ultimate purpose – that being, of course, millions of people joining hands to shatter all world records for self-satisfaction.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski



Monday June 27, 2005

Just slightly missing my point

Remind me not to write about immigration again, unless I’m in the mood to be harassed by cranks who think a column about how constituency offices handle casework (more interesting than it sounds…honest) is their queue to let me know why we have to shut our door to any and all immigrants.

Anyway, Friday’s column in question is now here.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Dirty money

I don’t get particularly bent out of shape when it comes to most gambling, state-sanctioned or otherwise. I find Ontario casinos depressing (as opposed to Vegas casinos, which I find thoroughly delightful in small doses), but relatively inoffensive. But VLTs are a whole different story – so much so that I can’t believe several provinces still have them.

Set up a few scattered casinos and you’re giving gamblers the option of going out of their way to feed their habit. But stick thousands of highly addictive machines in bars and you’re bringing the gambling to them – practically daring those trying to get over a habit to take it up again. It’s bad enough that governments allow this to happen; it’s absolutely repugnant that they’re the ones running the racket.

Anyway, good on these folks for protesting them. I hope someone’s listening.

>>
 Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Island in the sun

Truth be told, I’ve never liked outdoor festivals as much as I’d like to like them. I tend to get a little cranky when I’m out in the sun too long, and rarely does live music benefit from being played in broad daylight. But I’m still pretty sure yesterday’s Island show was a little weak next to last year’s – admittedly an unfair comparison, since it had no pretense of being the same thing, but an inevitable one nevertheless.

Not to say it didn’t have its moments. Broken Social Scene has to be the world’s most perfect festival act, since the crowded stage of talented musicians with burgeoning solo careers/side projects makes every song seem like a closing collaboration between four different bands. And their new stuff is very promising. And Metric was fun, mostly because Emily Haines is pretty irresistible. And while I got there too late to see them, I hear Most Serene Republic were solid, which I don’t find hard to believe since they seem to be on a steady upward curve. (Last Friday’s MSR write-up from the Post is here, by the way.)

Thing is, though, this wasn’t a cohesive lineup in any way I could quite figure out. Last year was basically a coming-out party for Canadian indie (or quasi-indie) acts – one that, in addition to headliners Sloan and Sam Roberts, served up Broken Social Scene, the Arcade Fire (just before they hit it big), the Stills, Death from Above and the Constantines, among others. This year seemed to be aiming for the same thing, sort of, but closing with Modest Mouse – and inserting their sub-par opening act earlier on the bill – confused everything. And much as Modest Mouse turned in a perfectly competent set, the vibe was so different from BSS that the whole thing was jarring.

Anyway, just saying. On the bright side, I discovered the joy of water taxis, which are, like, 100X better than ferries, and nowhere close to 100X as expensive.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski

Learning to love it

Two polar-opposite takes on the Argos’ revamped digs from the Sun’s Mike Ullmer and the Star’s Dave Feschuk.

For what it’s worth, I fall somewhere between the two. I’ve long hated the Dome/Rogers Centre, so much so that I was even willing to embrace the York scheme. But it did look a hell of a lot better on Saturday, with the Argos having properly put their stamp on it. And the combination of an enthusiastic crowd and a pre-game presentation miles ahead of anything they’ve done in recent years actually made for a pretty fun atmosphere.

Of course, you’d have to be pretty comatose not to have gotten into this one…pretty thrilling game, even with the plethora of mistakes and the disappointing final score. I’m pretty jacked for this season, but you probably already guessed that.

>> Send your comments to Adam Radwanski


Radwanski's Ramblings from June 16-23, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 10-16, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 3-9, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 20-June 2, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 13-19, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 29-May 12, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 22-28, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 8-21, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 1-7, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from March 25-31, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from March 18-24, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from March 11-17, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from February 25-March 10, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from February 11-24, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from January 28-February 10, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from January 14-27, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from December 31, 2004-January 13, 2005

Radwanski's Ramblings from December 17-30, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from December 3-16, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from November 19-December 2, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from November 5-18, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from October 22-November 4, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from October 8-21, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from September 24-October 7, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from September 17-23, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from September 3-16, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from August 20-September 2, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from August 6-19, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 23-August 5, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 16-22, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from July 9-15, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 25-July 8, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 18-24, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 11-17, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from June 4-10, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 28-June 3, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 21-27, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 14-20, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from May 7-13, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 23-May 6, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 16-22, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 9-15, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from April 2-8, 2004

Radwanski's Ramblings from March 26-April 1, 2004





Site best viewed using Internet Explorer

Reproduction of material from any AdamRadwanski.com page without prior explicit permission is strictly prohibited.

© Design and Content 2004
All rights reserved.